TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Serving static files: a comparison between Apache, Nginx, Varnish and G-WAN

29 pointsby tswicegoodalmost 14 years ago

4 comments

jbyersalmost 14 years ago
The comments on this post are worth reading. It's impossible to construct a meaningful synthetic benchmark without more rigor about what client is being used, how it's configured, how the OS is tuned, testing against actual files (rather than a "Hello World" 100 byte file), details on default tuning for each webserver, and finally what exactly is intended to be tested and what is in fact being tested.<p>A great post on the subject from mnot:<p><a href="http://www.mnot.net/blog/2011/05/18/http_benchmark_rules" rel="nofollow">http://www.mnot.net/blog/2011/05/18/http_benchmark_rules</a>
评论 #2630390 未加载
dochtmanalmost 14 years ago
Newer benchmark from the same author:<p><a href="http://nbonvin.wordpress.com/2011/03/24/serving-small-static-files-which-server-to-use/" rel="nofollow">http://nbonvin.wordpress.com/2011/03/24/serving-small-static...</a><p>This GWAN thing looks rather interesting. A bunch more benchmarks can be found on <a href="http://gwan.com/" rel="nofollow">http://gwan.com/</a>.
评论 #2630935 未加载
owenmarshallalmost 14 years ago
Benchmarks that don't include standard deviations are worse than bad. They are <i>dangerous</i>.
jjmalmost 14 years ago
Regarding Apache Traffic Server, here are some benchmarks: <a href="http://www.ogre.com/node/391" rel="nofollow">http://www.ogre.com/node/391</a>