TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The MIT Press launches Direct to Open

520 pointsby orixilusabout 4 years ago

17 comments

dangabout 4 years ago
Submitted title was &quot;MIT Press has granted full access to all its journals&quot;. What&#x27;s the source for that? It&#x27;s extremely important to be accurate with this kind of thing. The discussion below is all based on assuming that that title is literally true.<p>The HN guidelines specifically ask you not to rewrite titles unless they are misleading or linkbait: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;newsguidelines.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;newsguidelines.html</a>.<p>I&#x27;ve changed the URL from <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mitpressjournals.org&#x2F;action&#x2F;showPublications" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mitpressjournals.org&#x2F;action&#x2F;showPublications</a>, which doesn&#x27;t explain anything, to the press release which, although it&#x27;s a press release, sort of does. Nevertheless it&#x27;s hard to figure out what exactly is being announced here.
评论 #26323383 未加载
评论 #26323319 未加载
sitkackabout 4 years ago
To MIT Press, thank you. But without an announcement, I fear that this is just a one time, brief thing.<p>Springer did this awhile ago for a weekend, not its entire catalog but many books were free to download. It was wonderful, but brief. From down thread, <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mitpress.mit.edu&#x2F;blog&#x2F;mit-press-launches-direct-open" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mitpress.mit.edu&#x2F;blog&#x2F;mit-press-launches-direct-open</a><p>I think it is important for folks to recognize how hard this must have been and how many heated verbal battles were exchanged inside of MIT over this. Thank You. And thank Aaron, always a champion in spreading the world&#x27;s knowledge to the most people possible. We should empower everyone as much as we can with the bits we have available.<p>Folks should check some fun journals like<p>Computer Music Journal <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mitpressjournals.org&#x2F;loi&#x2F;comj" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mitpressjournals.org&#x2F;loi&#x2F;comj</a><p>Evolutionary Computation <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mitpressjournals.org&#x2F;loi&#x2F;evco" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mitpressjournals.org&#x2F;loi&#x2F;evco</a><p>Add your own below!
评论 #26322811 未加载
评论 #26322850 未加载
评论 #26325367 未加载
dan-robertsonabout 4 years ago
It seems slightly weird to me that university presses and learned society journals aren’t generally open access. I thought the point was to aid the university’s research. Surely it helps the name of the university to have important widely accessible journals with the university’s name on them. Maybe the presses tend to have been spun off as commercial enterprises, or maybe the university really loves the income. Or maybe they are really expensive to run for some reason. I know the press at my university has a pretty large building but I’d figured a lot of it was a warehouse. Maybe it’s full of salespeople negotiating with librarians.<p>I don’t think there’s much hope of the commercial journals owned by Elsevier or Springer opening up, but I do hope that the trend of journals flipping (where the entire editorial board resigns and forms a similarly named open access journal) will increase.<p>Perhaps another problem is that in those fields that are already closest to open access (say because they use the arxiv), there is less incentive for people to jot publish in commercial journals as everyone who matters will have already read the preprint in the arxiv.
评论 #26323113 未加载
评论 #26323569 未加载
annoyingnoobabout 4 years ago
Thinking of Aaron Swartz right now.
评论 #26322598 未加载
评论 #26322445 未加载
评论 #26322728 未加载
评论 #26322446 未加载
评论 #26322443 未加载
评论 #26322975 未加载
评论 #26322903 未加载
评论 #26322554 未加载
评论 #26322423 未加载
dougmccuneabout 4 years ago
Lots of comments here about academic journals. This announcement is about monographs, not journals. Monographs are books. Usually small print runs, as they are niche and targeted for specific academic disciplines. The target audience is other academics and distribution is heavily through academic libraries. Think of dissertations when you’re completing a PhD.
tokaiabout 4 years ago
The &#x27;full access&#x27; in the title here made me frown. Some publishers like to use that term when they let you read the article, without making the licensing open. It seems like the journals are released with a mix of true open access and read access. There is yet some way to go sadly.
macg333about 4 years ago
That&#x27;s great! I&#x27;m glad they are doing this.<p>I can&#x27;t wait for Elsevier to follow suit. &#x2F;s
评论 #26322568 未加载
评论 #26322820 未加载
Gene5iveabout 4 years ago
Shoulda done this on January 10th, 2013
UncleOxidantabout 4 years ago
Very cool. I followed a link to their Evolutionary Computation Journal last week and wondered why they were letting me read the articles for free - now I know why.
tester756about 4 years ago
&gt;Reviews of &quot;Emergence of a novel SARS-CoV-2 strain in Southern California, USA&quot;<p>&gt;<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rapidreviewscovid19.mitpress.mit.edu&#x2F;pub&#x2F;jrlok92l&#x2F;release&#x2F;3" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rapidreviewscovid19.mitpress.mit.edu&#x2F;pub&#x2F;jrlok92l&#x2F;re...</a><p>&gt;Reviewer 1 (Takahiko Koyama) | ◻ Reliable<p>&gt;Reviewer 2 (François Balloux) | ◻◻◻◻ Misleading<p>&gt;Reviewer 3 (Lee W Riley) | ◻◻◻◻ Misleading<p>Interesting
ilakshabout 4 years ago
Monographs means books and papers right? But I can already get almost all papers on sites like arxiv or if not then on sci-hub.
drummerabout 4 years ago
Any interesting books worth checking out? Does anyone have recommendations?
jonas_kgomoabout 4 years ago
How easy is it to publish your own open source journal, genuinely curious!
评论 #26323544 未加载
nameless_meabout 4 years ago
Aaron Schwartz, you did not die in vain. RIP.
mav3rickabout 4 years ago
What are some good books &#x2F; papers here ?
redofracabout 4 years ago
Were the MIT journals previously behind a paywall? Is there any info about the move?
评论 #26322432 未加载
chovybizzassabout 4 years ago
Great now donate to the suicide prevention foundation.
评论 #26322590 未加载
评论 #26322735 未加载