TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Best to avoid using the “Have I been facebooked” website

34 pointsby code-expressabout 4 years ago

10 comments

crtasmabout 4 years ago
&gt; The answer is: use HIBP, or <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;haveibeenpwned.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;haveibeenpwned.com&#x2F;</a>. They’ve got the technical (and social) bits of this process right!<p>While I&#x27;d trust HIBP more it isn&#x27;t doing anything significantly different with the lookup process, is it?<p>&quot;There&#x27;s no k-anonymity implementation for phone numbers at this point in time.&quot; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.troyhunt.com&#x2F;the-facebook-phone-numbers-are-now-searchable-in-have-i-been-pwned&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.troyhunt.com&#x2F;the-facebook-phone-numbers-are-now-...</a><p>Putting a number sends it directly in the GET request: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;haveibeenpwned.com&#x2F;unifiedsearch&#x2F;%2B1%20123%20456%20789" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;haveibeenpwned.com&#x2F;unifiedsearch&#x2F;%2B1%20123%20456%20...</a><p>Edit: as does looking up an email. It&#x27;s password lookups that use local hashing&#x2F;k-anonymity: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;haveibeenpwned.com&#x2F;Privacy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;haveibeenpwned.com&#x2F;Privacy</a>
评论 #26719585 未加载
aeternumabout 4 years ago
It&#x27;s kinda crazy how paranoid people have become around stuff like phone numbers. Even if this site were recording the numbers, what good is it?
评论 #26719693 未加载
评论 #26719854 未加载
评论 #26719515 未加载
评论 #26719155 未加载
thrillabout 4 years ago
If you&#x27;re on the &quot;facebooked&quot; list your number is already disclosed and correlated to you and your email address - inputting it onto a website to see if it&#x27;s one of the compromised will have absolutely no effect.
评论 #26719611 未加载
评论 #26719609 未加载
评论 #26719867 未加载
评论 #26720404 未加载
TwoBitabout 4 years ago
This post is ridiculous. Why does this crap keep making it to the front page?
评论 #26720169 未加载
hartatorabout 4 years ago
Well, it’s sending a sha256 for your phone number, how is this not good enough? How you would expect to check the number in the database without hashing or passing it clear?
评论 #26720033 未加载
unnouinceputabout 4 years ago
So, the main point of this article to avoid that site, is that they could google SHA256 for a known simple number, namely &quot;11111111111&quot; and boom!, this way the site programmer would reverse back to know your number?<p>If that&#x27;s the case I suggest he would google Bitcoin&#x27;s SHA256 numbers too. Heck, at ~55k USD per bitcoin, he would become, literally, multimillionaire overnight. What a buffoon! And it hit HN top as well, pfff.
评论 #26720438 未加载
bosswipeabout 4 years ago
I&#x27;m more annoyed with the security community making it so hard to get access to the raw leak. There&#x27;s a weird elitist attitude of &quot;only we can handle the data&quot; even though every black and white hat in the world already grabbed it.
Arainachabout 4 years ago
The two sites seem to have different sources, however - HIBP claims neither my email nor my phone number were involved in the FB leak, while the &quot;Facebooked&quot; site correctly identified that my number was tied to my name and other pieces of information.
surroundabout 4 years ago
What of this version, which sends 99 random numbers along with your real number?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thenewseachday.com&#x2F;private-facebook-phone-numbers-us" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thenewseachday.com&#x2F;private-facebook-phone-number...</a>
KMnO4about 4 years ago
A safer way: just download the dump for yourself and Ctrl-F your number.<p>An <i>even safer way</i>: Look at your phone log. If you haven’t received 25 spam calls in the past week, your number probably isn’t in the list.
评论 #26719823 未加载
评论 #26719970 未加载