TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

A Mathematical Trivium (1991) [pdf]

70 pointsby cesarosumabout 4 years ago

9 comments

hpcjoeabout 4 years ago
Very enjoyable! I started working a few problems in my head, and realized I&#x27;d run out of scratch ram quickly.<p>I especially liked his points on examination, what we call the &quot;orals&quot; in Physics. There, the (in his words, defenseless) student is up in front of a board, while professors throw problems at them. I had a few good questions on mine, and one which was ... poorly specified. I remember thinking I simply had to crank on that problem, showing my thinking processes to try to answer the question. At the end, the prof nodded, pointed to something before my conclusion, and said &quot;that was as far as I got.&quot;<p>I remember feeling relieved yet angry. Just smiled, nodded, thanked him for the question, and moved on.<p>Talk about an imbalanced power dynamic.
lordnachoabout 4 years ago
Seems pretty reasonable to me. If you look at these questions and learn how to do them, you&#x27;ll have learned a fair bit. It&#x27;s not like you can learn by rote all the transformations you&#x27;ll need to answer these, you&#x27;re better off just learning the theory.<p>I would have loved to have a simple 100 known-but-non-trivial questions like this. You avoid the lottery of having to remember some particular detail (say some integral that appears in some derivation that an adhoc question might contain), but you don&#x27;t avoid having to actually know how the theory works, because it&#x27;s a little bit too hard to memorize.<p>Admittedly you might still get stuck on a trivial step but at least you&#x27;ve had a chance to go over the questions, and it might be relatively fresh.
评论 #26757850 未加载
Koshkinabout 4 years ago
I like the (possibly, older) style of the integral sign that appears in this paper better than how it is usually typeset these days.
评论 #26756093 未加载
评论 #26757616 未加载
enriqutoabout 4 years ago
The limit in question 2 is wickedly difficult to solve by traditional means. You have to apply l&#x27;Hôpital rule about seven times, and it becomes a monster formula. Or, you expand everything by Taylor up to order eight. In any case, the computation fills several pages. There must surely be a geometrical reasoning to compute that limit.
评论 #26756974 未加载
评论 #26759164 未加载
ur-whaleabout 4 years ago
Curious how many of these can be tackled directly by a modern symbolic math package like Mathematica.<p>Question 2 in particular, I&#x27;d be curious if it can get there without guidance.<p>[EDIT]: Answer is yes: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wolframalpha.com&#x2F;input&#x2F;?i=Limit%5B%28Sin%5BTan%5Bx%5D%5D+-+Tan%5BSin%5Bx%5D%5D%29%2F%28ArcSin%5BArcTan%5Bx%5D%5D+-+ArcTan%5BArcSin%5Bx%5D%5D%29%2C+x+-%3E+0%5D" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wolframalpha.com&#x2F;input&#x2F;?i=Limit%5B%28Sin%5BTan%5...</a>
SquibblesReduxabout 4 years ago
For anyone curious about the mean of the 100th power of the sin function: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;math.stackexchange.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;24533&#x2F;find-the-average-of-sin100-x-in-5-minutes" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;math.stackexchange.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;24533&#x2F;find-the-aver...</a>
评论 #26760458 未加载
ryan93about 4 years ago
What percentage of MIT grads could answer even half of these. Pretty hardcore questions it seems.
vmilnerabout 4 years ago
Is question 1 just asking for the student to sketch the derivative and integral curves of an arbitrary curve sketched by the teacher?<p>It seems a bit different to the other questions (but is question 1, so might be an &quot;easy&quot; starter.)
randomopiningabout 4 years ago
Trivium - Throes of Perdition