TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Internet Search Tips

344 pointsby hargupabout 4 years ago

20 comments

Jeddabout 4 years ago
To augment the suggestion around learning &#x2F; using hot-keys, ctrl-shift-t (chrome) undoes the most recent tab or browser window close. It&#x27;s insanely handy, but from casual observation, not well known &#x2F; used.<p>If you have a mouse with some additional side buttons (that you don&#x27;t already have mapped) I can strongly recommend mapping them to ctrl-pgup and ctrl-pgdn, so you can go left&#x2F;right with your tabs in the current browser without having to relocate either your hands or your mouse pointer. Because I tend to open many links to new tabs (middle-click) - a consequence of living in a country (Australia) with poor internet speeds - I&#x27;m now lost whenever I have to use a mouse without those buttons.<p>Watching people use the mouse to go to the hamburger menu to recover a just-closed-tab, or to the tab bar to switch between tabs, or moving the mouse to the scrollbar to move the content up&#x2F;down, is the contemporary equivalent of watching someone play Solitaire <i>intentionally</i> poorly.
评论 #26858860 未加载
评论 #26857962 未加载
评论 #26858172 未加载
userbinatorabout 4 years ago
Unfortunately, using the advanced search operators &quot;too much&quot; can get you banned from Google for a few hours, where you get an infinite series of CAPTCHAs. What counts as too much seems to vary widely, but I&#x27;ve triggered it with as few as <i>one</i> query for some obscure phrase using site: .<p>Google is definitely far worse for obscure things than it was a few years or a decade ago. 2010 is roughly when I started noticing it.
评论 #26859212 未加载
CGamesPlayabout 4 years ago
I&#x27;ve seen two links to this domain in as many days and I absolutely can&#x27;t stand the developer&#x27;s treatment of links. I can&#x27;t actually click on them, because just hovering them opens them in some ephemeral pseudo-popup, and I can&#x27;t read the main article, because scrolling will invariably hover over some link which will then open that popup and cover up the article I was reading.<p>It&#x27;s absurd to me that this apparently independent blogger&#x27;s website is the best argument I&#x27;ve ever seen for &quot;JavaScript should be disabled by default.&quot;
评论 #26862697 未加载
评论 #26858851 未加载
评论 #26859275 未加载
评论 #26865417 未加载
_Microftabout 4 years ago
I&#x27;m unsure about other browsers but Firefox has <i>&quot;find as you type&quot;</i> functionality built. It allows to search the current webpage by simply starting to type. If the typed text matches a link, one can press enter to follow it. This feature makes navigating and searching the current page a breeze and can greatly speed up your web browsing in general.<p>Here are settings related to the feature:<p>To enable it from <i>about:config</i>, you want to set <i>accessibility.typeaheadfind</i> to true. The timeout after which the search bar disappears again is set as number of milliseconds in <i>accessibility.typeaheadfind.timeout</i>. The default of 5000 milliseconds might be excessive if you do not want the bar to be in the way during browsing. I&#x27;m very happy with 1500 for that which gives 1.5 seconds after the last keystroke to e.g. start editing the search string before the search bar disappears again.<p>Edit: it looks like you can enable <i>typeaheadfind</i> in the preferences nowadays. Tweaking the timeout still requires going to about:config, though.
评论 #26855819 未加载
Sniffnoyabout 4 years ago
Gwern mentions the benefit of being affiliated with a university so you can use ILL (in particular, Illiad). I think it&#x27;s worth mentioning some ways you can get ILL without having to be a student or professor. (Note that these are not actually going to be practical for most people, but for people who happen to be in the right situation to take advantage of them, they can be quite useful.)<p>1. Live in New York City. Yes, the New York Public Library seems to provide access to Illiad! I haven&#x27;t actually tried making use of this, but it&#x27;s on the website. Obviously you&#x27;re not going to move to New York just to take advantage of this, but if you happen to already live there, you have this option!<p>I expect there are other cities and non-university organizations that provide access to Illiad; I mention New York just because it&#x27;s one I know of. If other people know of others, I&#x27;d be glad to know of them!<p>2. Get a position as a &quot;visiting scholar&quot; at a nearby university. :) OK, this one will likely require knowing someone there, and maybe having a PhD since there may be some minimum requirements, but generally if you can get a professor to name you can one you can become a &quot;visiting scholar&quot; -- this isn&#x27;t a job, they don&#x27;t pay you anything and you&#x27;re not required to do anything for them, and as such there&#x27;s no hiring process, you just can get named one if you meet the minimum requirements (they may want to see some sort of CV also). They won&#x27;t pay you any money but you will get library access, including ILL! So, y&#x27;know, that&#x27;s useful. :)<p>Obviously that route isn&#x27;t open to everyone either. But depending on your situation it can certainly be easier than enrolling as a student or getting a job as a professor!
评论 #26864014 未加载
lavoiemsabout 4 years ago
A neat trick that is not presented is to use <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.connectedpapers.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.connectedpapers.com&#x2F;</a><p>The website presents a graph of related works clustered by similarities.
评论 #26856026 未加载
tuxabout 4 years ago
Thanks for the article, this reminded me of GHDB; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.exploit-db.com&#x2F;google-hacking-database" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.exploit-db.com&#x2F;google-hacking-database</a>
评论 #26860654 未加载
maddybooabout 4 years ago
I want to add a suggestion to the hotkey shortcuts section: I use the Chrome&#x2F;Firefox addon SurfingKeys [0] with my own configuration [1] in which I’ve added search engine auto-suggestions for just over 50 sites. So, for example, to start searching Google Scholar I type `ags`, or to search GitHub I type `agh`. Check out the screenshots [2] to see what I mean.<p>I’m currently working on cleaning up the code and making installation as simple as pasting a GitHub release URL into the SurfingKeys settings. I hope to have this done within a week or two.<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;brookhong&#x2F;Surfingkeys" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;brookhong&#x2F;Surfingkeys</a><p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;b0o&#x2F;surfingkeys-conf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;b0o&#x2F;surfingkeys-conf</a><p>[2]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;b0o&#x2F;surfingkeys-conf#screenshots" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;b0o&#x2F;surfingkeys-conf#screenshots</a>
评论 #26855658 未加载
smiley1437about 4 years ago
Great summary of tips<p>Long ago I realized the the only reason I have a job is my ability to google stuff lol
评论 #26855835 未加载
the_arunabout 4 years ago
The site is designed beautifully to distract me to look around how it has been implemented rather than the main topic - search tips. Yes, Font could have been better for readability :)
评论 #26855570 未加载
sneakabout 4 years ago
I miss the days when Google was AND search always and by default.<p>Now they&#x27;re terrified of not returning any results. Even when there aren&#x27;t any results, they return a page full of ads that looks like results - at some point in the last dozen years, the empty &quot;no results found&quot; google page bit the dust.
评论 #26855896 未加载
zeeshanqureshiabout 4 years ago
Great set of tips.<p>On a side note, I wish the site had a simple, easy to read fonts option similar to the switchable light&#x2F;dark mode.
评论 #26854857 未加载
jl6about 4 years ago
Fravia’s searchlores for the 21st century!
评论 #26856231 未加载
mcshicksabout 4 years ago
Searching internet archive for books is really great. I do prefer books to online reading, and often times I can get a book I&#x27;m interested in via inter-library loan if I am willing to wait. However if I can read the first chapter online on the internet archive I know if it&#x27;s worth the wait to read the actual book. I do see it mentioned quite often on HN, but I feel like the population in general when I mention it I don&#x27;t get the same response I do if I mention say Google or Wikipedia. I would not say IA is on par with those in terms of how often I use it, but it definitely offers something significant that is not offered elsewhere as far as I can tell.
grimgrinabout 4 years ago
off base question, i suppose inspired by porch sitting + reading gwern&#x27;s case studies: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gwern.net&#x2F;Search#case-studies" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gwern.net&#x2F;Search#case-studies</a><p>i think i would have found most of the examples gwern listed, maybe not as quickly. i go wild on google iteratively before jumping to another search engine<p>but, is there a tournament or contest along the lines of &#x27;producing some result via searches&#x27; quicker than others? im thinking a form of this might exist at defcon&#x2F;thotcon&#x2F;similar<p>ironically, instead of searching, im asking here haha
评论 #26857502 未加载
评论 #26858188 未加载
WarOnPrivacyabout 4 years ago
I see Gwern doesn&#x27;t encourage using operands in DDG.<p>Maybe that&#x27;s because DDG ignores them.
评论 #26854429 未加载
dredmorbiusabout 4 years ago
An excellent set of (re)search methods, many of which I&#x27;m well familiar. A few notes and additions:<p>- There are numerous public-domain full-text archives, including Project Gutenberg, Internet Archive, and many small specialised library collections (usually focused on a given topic, e.g., Online Library of Liberty). Less useful for post-1925 materials, but often high-quality renderings (either scans or proofread re-typeset &#x2F; typed-in documents) available. Google Books also allows full PDF downloads for public-domain works, generally.<p>- NYPL&#x27;s Secretly Public Domain project has been reviewing copyright renewal records to find works published <i>since</i> 1923, and before 1964, whose copyright was never renenwed. Other projects (Internet Archive notably) have been flagging these works as being in the public domain, and hence freed of any download restrictions.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nypl.org&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2019&#x2F;05&#x2F;31&#x2F;us-copyright-history-1923-1964" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nypl.org&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2019&#x2F;05&#x2F;31&#x2F;us-copyright-history-19...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nypl.org&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2018&#x2F;03&#x2F;30&#x2F;unlocking-record-american-creativity" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nypl.org&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2018&#x2F;03&#x2F;30&#x2F;unlocking-record-americ...</a><p>- OpenLibrary &#x2F; Internet Archive increasingly have current under-copyright books available for at least 1hr and up to 14 day loan. The reader is less elegant than it had been in past, but is viable.<p>- HathiTrust is all but useless with its download restrictions. It&#x27;s helpful to determine if records exist.<p>- Worldcat gets only a brief mention by Gwern. It&#x27;s a union catalog (a combined library catalog of a vast number of libraries worldwide), of books, articles, and other document types, and is an excellent way of determining <i>if</i> a book exists, what an author&#x27;s output is, and&#x2F;or the documents within a given search space. !worldcat DDG bang search, &quot;ti:&quot; is title, &quot;au:&quot; is author, &quot;kw:&quot; is keyword. Space any colons (&quot;:&quot;) occurring within search terms, or omit them entirely. You&#x27;ll still have to either find the digital record elsewhere, or track down a library, but quite useful.<p>- You can save online materials to the Internet Archive using the &#x27;save&#x27; URL:<p><pre><code> https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;save&#x2F;&lt;original_url&gt; </code></pre> So to save this particular HN discussion we&#x27;d specify:<p><pre><code> https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;save&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=26847596 </code></pre> You can submit that through any HTTP client (curl, wget, lynx, w3m, your GUI browser, etc.). Requests can be trivially scripted and batched.<p>This is ... documented somewhere (I stumbled across it myself), though I&#x27;m not finding the specifics. Related &quot;save page now&quot; functionality is mentioned here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.archive.org&#x2F;2019&#x2F;10&#x2F;23&#x2F;the-wayback-machines-save-page-now-is-new-and-improved&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.archive.org&#x2F;2019&#x2F;10&#x2F;23&#x2F;the-wayback-machines-sav...</a><p>- Motorised paper cutters are available at some photocopy shops. Inquire as to whether or not you can have books debinded by them. (Generally anything resembling paper is fine, though the blades can be damaged by metal or other materials.)
CompArtisanabout 4 years ago
Quite relevant and useful. For articles that are blocked by a paywall I usually search the article URL on www.archive.org and there&#x27;s usually an unblocked one there.
ergot_vacationabout 4 years ago
Some neat stuff here. Only VERY briefly mentioned (so briefly I missed it at first) however: Substituting Yandex for Google is great for many use cases. Being Russian, Yandex is no doubt heavily censored, but <i>only for things important to Russian politics</i>. Ironically, this means that for non-Russian users, it&#x27;s considerably LESS censored than Google, which has SEVERELY crippled its search in recent years in the name of politics, &quot;politics,&quot; DMCA madness, &quot;right to be forgotten&quot; etc.<p>The image search is especially impressive. Remember when Google Images used to give you actual results when trying to find the source of an obscure image? Yandex still does, and it does a bunch of other neat things too, like automatically trying to transcribe text from an image if it&#x27;s text-heavy. My instinct is that a lot of this capacity exists in Google Images, but is either mostly hidden from the user or deliberately hobbled to stop the oh so evil content pirates.<p>Zero privacy of course. Assume the Russian government is watching in realtime as you hammer in another inane search. But for some use cases that&#x27;s fine.
评论 #26856217 未加载
评论 #26858033 未加载
评论 #26859261 未加载
评论 #26857155 未加载
评论 #26857496 未加载
评论 #26875363 未加载
gwernabout 4 years ago
Should just link to <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gwern.net&#x2F;Search" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gwern.net&#x2F;Search</a> - the URL works fine, and the IA version has various glitches like the link icons.
评论 #26855381 未加载
评论 #26853270 未加载
评论 #26853445 未加载