SpiderMonkey JavaScript/WebAssembly Engine

&gt; After nearly 25 years.... we have a logo. &gt; &gt; And a new website!<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;SpiderMonkeyJS&#x2F;status&#x2F;1389985112620736516" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;SpiderMonkeyJS&#x2F;status&#x2F;138998511262073651...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;FirefoxNightly&#x2F;status&#x2F;1390208272041402369" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;FirefoxNightly&#x2F;status&#x2F;139020827204140236...</a>

The tarot-style images of the monkeys in the docs are amazing :) <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;spidermonkey.dev&#x2F;docs&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;spidermonkey.dev&#x2F;docs&#x2F;</a>

As one who has been incorporating SpiderMonkey as an engine for malicious JavaScript detection research efforts continually since Firefox 56, this is a big milestone.<p>No longer have to cut your teeth incognito in making a GUI-less customized Firefox jerry-rigged with numerous instrumentation points … repeatedly for each version.<p>This is it, researchers; have at it.

I could see Mozilla adapting this to be a serverless engine - like that of Cloudflare workers and Deno (based on V8) - could charge for enterprise usage and adaptions.<p>Has this been considered?

Sorry to ask, Apart from the website, what is new here for SpiderMonkey?

What is new here ... I think this has been around a while? I looked at the blog and the last entry was in May ... I must not be seeing it.

The notes on the TC39 meetings look really nice. Hopefully this will make it easier for people to get involved.

Can I compile the engine to wasm? Yes I want to run JS on wasm. Yes I have a reason.

New website?

Mozilla must be looking to get rid of the engine and throw it out to the community. Then they can fire more developers.