TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Google will soon switch on two-factor authentication by default

20 pointsby advpetcabout 4 years ago

8 comments

woliveirajrabout 4 years ago
My rant with that is that the normal, regular user won&#x27;t configure the fall-back solution. Nobody remembers to write down those numbers-and-codes; when they do, they don&#x27;t keep it safe and leave the paper over the desk.<p>When you travel abroad, is out of battery, break your phone, etc, etc, you&#x27;re 100% out of your digital life until you can overcome the 2FA limit. And this happens in the moments you need it most.
评论 #27067371 未加载
评论 #27067483 未加载
评论 #27067316 未加载
makecheckabout 4 years ago
My bank mandated some “phone code” for a transaction; only problem was that it didn’t arrive. So I tried again and again. 20 minutes later, like 7 of the things arrived all at once on my phone. The bank locked my account for “suspicious activity”, and it could only be unlocked with a phone call. Then I call them, the minimum estimated wait is 50 minutes (oh, and the estimate got worse each time I tried later; and they are not open on Sundays). It ended up taking days to fix something caused by THEIR unreliable mechanism.<p>I also had an issue with an account that had a 2FA option but via an app that proved dangerous because I accidentally forgot about it when switching phone <i>devices</i> (same number) and just about locked up my entire account trying to get it working again.<p>If you mandate 2FA, it has to work and it has to leave the customer better off. If not, why bother?
评论 #27069120 未加载
jqpabc123about 4 years ago
2FA sucks for so many reasons. Privacy is destroyed and losing your phone is multiplied into an even bigger disaster.<p>But just say &quot;no&quot; to Google and a lot of the issue goes away.
评论 #27066139 未加载
评论 #27068803 未加载
评论 #27068717 未加载
评论 #27066982 未加载
exabrialabout 4 years ago
If its SMS we&#x27;re all fucked. Cell carriers are not hardened against attack and nobody&#x27;s life savings, communication, social life, etc should be wrapped up in their incompetence.
Wowfunhappyabout 4 years ago
But can I switch it off if I want? The article doesn&#x27;t say.
ergot_vacationabout 4 years ago
Wasn&#x27;t there a wave of articles just a few months ago about how it was time to give up on two-factor because phones&#x2F;sims were too easy to hack, spoof etc? Regardless, the day a service or site (other than my bank) requires a phone or other physical device to be tied to my account is the day I stop using the service. It&#x27;s a profoundly bad idea for so many reasons. Passwords are like democracy: the worst idea, except for all the others.
advpetcabout 4 years ago
The blog post from google: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.blog.google&#x2F;technology&#x2F;safety-security&#x2F;a-simpler-and-safer-future-without-passwords&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.blog.google&#x2F;technology&#x2F;safety-security&#x2F;a-simpler...</a>
Crash0v3rid3about 4 years ago
This is great news but your phone is still required for two-factor which is an easy attack vector with some social engineering with mobile carriers.
评论 #27065804 未加载