TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Bezos Calculator

30 pointsby ImpressiveWebsabout 4 years ago

6 comments

11thEarlOfMarabout 4 years ago
The growth of the wealth of the super rich, and the increasing gap with the less rich, is a manifestation of exponential math. Two investors put money into the same investment that grows at 10%. One invests $1,000, the other $10,000. Each year, the gap will increase.<p>There is nothing immoral about this.<p>Where super wealth becomes a problem is when that wealth is used to influence policy. Effectively, the super-wealthy can choose to behave as unelected politicians. This is a problem.<p>Soros and the Open Society Foundations is an example of where this is manifest. He contributed $32 billion to fund the organization. His Open Society Foundation employs 1,150 professionals who promote his political agenda[1]. Whether you agree with his political agenda or not, Soros and I are both American citizens. We both have one vote. My influence in US politics should equal his. It does not. The only Americans who should have more political influence than I are those who have been elected or appointed to government positions.<p>Carlos Slim has owned 9-17% of the New York Times. Lauren Powell Jobs foundation owns the majority of The Atlantic. Bezos himself purchased the Washington Post. Perhaps these simply seemed like good investments, and I am certain that wealthy persons have owned media for centuries. But the unprecedented wealth of this century increases the potential influence the super wealthy can wield. This is a concern.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2018&#x2F;11&#x2F;07&#x2F;billionaires-are-buying-media-companies-new-york-times-not-for-sale.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2018&#x2F;11&#x2F;07&#x2F;billionaires-are-buying-medi...</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.opensocietyfoundations.org&#x2F;grants&#x2F;past?page=2" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.opensocietyfoundations.org&#x2F;grants&#x2F;past?page=2</a>
评论 #27148662 未加载
sneakabout 4 years ago
Capital gains are not cash income, and to treat them the same is to fundamentally misunderstand money.<p>The term &quot;make money&quot; is overloaded, and refers to several entirely distinct activities that share only the units in which they are denominated.
评论 #27145463 未加载
评论 #27145455 未加载
评论 #27145547 未加载
didibusabout 4 years ago
It&#x27;s just a hard coded fixed constant rate in the code, and not actually showing you the real amount of wealth accrued by Bezos.<p>Just go look at the source: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;alvaromontoro&#x2F;bezos-calculator&#x2F;blob&#x2F;main&#x2F;script.js#L6" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;alvaromontoro&#x2F;bezos-calculator&#x2F;blob&#x2F;main&#x2F;...</a>
评论 #27145573 未加载
hzhou321about 4 years ago
It is not money since he can&#x27;t possibly spend it faster than he gains them. It is just power, the amount of control that he has over fellow inhabitants. Unlike money, he doesn&#x27;t need to spend it to manifest it.
评论 #27145467 未加载
Vasloabout 4 years ago
It’s got 3 likes so far and already in the top 10? I don’t get the algorithm.
agorabinaryabout 4 years ago
Good for him.