To save others a little time, 89-2 vote. The nays were Cruz (Rep TX) and Lee (Rep UT)<p><a href="https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=117&session=1&vote=00178#position" rel="nofollow">https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_...</a>
Does this mean that Flint, Michigan may finally get the funding to replace it's poisonous water infrastructure? That would be greatly appreciated by a number of people I know.
A great way to clean our water is to ban what creates the pollution going into it, especially single-use plastic, factory farms, and a lot of packaging. If they want to take baby steps, use proper accounting -- that is, charge manufacturers and buyers the true cost of cleaning the pollution their products make, which could be through a tax on pollution so those who pollute pay to clean it, not all taxpayers. Think Coca-Cola as one example of many.<p>We can spoon out the flood, but as long as we have to turn off the spigot, now is the most effective time.