At least one of the emails [0] shows Fauci had evidence of a possible lab leak in January 2020. If the virus' genome is inconsistent with evolutionary theory, that's a major red flag - and very early on in the pandemic.<p>We should continue to search for the reservoir animal and continue to pressure China to provide blood tests from researchers at the Wuhan lab. Without either exculpatory evidence for the Wuhan lab or clear evidence that it was a reservoir animal, the Wuhan lab leak theory should not be dismissed<p>Fauci was still saying [1] a reservoir animal was the most likely cause of the jump to humans a few days ago, despite having contrary evidence before almost anyone else.<p>I don't know why he isn't qualifying that more, but it's hard to see how it's not politics.<p>[0]<a href="https://twitter.com/JamesCTobias/status/1399811395043004418/photo/1" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/JamesCTobias/status/1399811395043004418/...</a><p>[1]<a href="https://youtu.be/ilt_NcaIIRk?t=143" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/ilt_NcaIIRk?t=143</a>
I can tell from the headlines about this that there was nothing juicy in these and that Fauci is a boring medical professional. Unreal that the guy is 80
watching the mainstream media from the past few days sure makes it seem like they're preparing to throw Fauci under the bus now that truth is starting to come out
At first I felt good that we had an expert leading us in this endeavor, this pandemic, the more this guy talks the less trust and faith I have an anything he hast to say. Now he just seems like a political hack.
>"despite some crazy people in this world"<p>Is making biological weapons of mass destruction crazy?<p>Fauci does not think so.<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-flu-virus-risk-worth-taking/2011/12/30/gIQAM9sNRP_story.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-flu-virus-risk-wor...</a>