TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The shortest, regex breaking website-domain possible: http://pn/

31 pointsby tomkleinalmost 4 years ago
Unfortunately, I can not add the domain directly to HN. Here it is:<p>http:&#x2F;&#x2F;pn&#x2F;<p>It indeed runs a webserver.

7 comments

schoenalmost 4 years ago
In an earlier thread I was claiming that <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ai&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ai&#x2F;</a> was no longer operating, but I belatedly learned that this is because systemd&#x27;s DNS resolver has hard-coded a refusal to look up addresses with a single label from servers outside the LAN. I misinterpreted the lack of results as implying that it had been removed upstream.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=27157712" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=27157712</a><p>So, (1) there is another site that is as short as the one you mentioned, and (2) Linux systems that default to using systemd-resolve won&#x27;t be able to see either of them!
评论 #27429682 未加载
评论 #27428869 未加载
callen43almost 4 years ago
I almost get the impression that the only single restriction to urls is having http(s):&#x2F;&#x2F; at their beginning.<p>Also reminds me on this interesting collection of unusual urls (and regular expressions) <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mathiasbynens.be&#x2F;demo&#x2F;url-regex" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mathiasbynens.be&#x2F;demo&#x2F;url-regex</a>
linuxfan2021almost 4 years ago
This is very cool and I have 0% idea how it works. My work&#x27;s network actually blocks this as &#x27;Unknown&#x27;, but I&#x27;ll check it when I get home.
dalmo3almost 4 years ago
How do you even access it? It won&#x27;t resolve for me (1.0.0.1). redbot.org can&#x27;t see it either. who.is falls back to pn.com.
评论 #27429220 未加载
评论 #27429158 未加载
WalterGRalmost 4 years ago
Whoa. Details?
评论 #27428640 未加载
MivLivesalmost 4 years ago
It doesn&#x27;t seem to have a corresponding ip, at least for me. Wonder if Pihole can&#x27;t handle it.
评论 #27430489 未加载
bawolffalmost 4 years ago
I thought TLDs having A records wasn&#x27;t allowed under ICANN rules? Is that incorrect?
评论 #27437760 未加载