TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Implications of the rocket equation without the math

24 pointsby uncertainquarkalmost 4 years ago

2 comments

boredprogramingalmost 4 years ago
In the future, we may have better ways of escaping earth than our brute force rockets.<p>If we can use our atmosphere as oxidizer, like planes do, we could get to orbit with far better mass fraction. And far less fuel. Closer to a normal plane than a tin can full of explosives.<p>Problems are heat related, at speeds and altitude needed regular jet engines would melt. There&#x27;s ongoing research into precoolers to make the concept work with fairly normal engines.<p>The British are working on this, with Skylon and the Sabre engine. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Skylon_(spacecraft)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Skylon_(spacecraft)</a>
评论 #27560521 未加载
avmichalmost 4 years ago
It&#x27;s not the payload mass increase which leads to exponential increase of starting mass. It&#x27;s the payload <i>speed</i> increase which requires exponential increase in starting mass.