TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

SiFive P550 Core: High-Performance RISC-V Processor

191 pointsby andrewncalmost 4 years ago

9 comments

1MachineElfalmost 4 years ago
Hopefully the recent acquisition rumors don&#x27;t spell the end of this healthy competition between x86 and RISC-V.<p>I wonder what we&#x27;ll see as a result of this partnership with Intel:<p><i>SiFive also confirmed that the IFC RISC-V application development platform will use the Performance P550 core on Intel&#x27;s 7nm Horse Creek platform.</i><p>Link: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.phoronix.com&#x2F;scan.php?page=news_item&amp;px=SiFive-Performance-P550-P270" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.phoronix.com&#x2F;scan.php?page=news_item&amp;px=SiFive-P...</a>
评论 #27593189 未加载
评论 #27599937 未加载
评论 #27593172 未加载
ch_123almost 4 years ago
I hope they release an update of the &quot;Unmatched&quot; motherboard with one of these chips. I&#x27;m reluctant to spend ~$700 on a platform which uses in-order cores which are presumably designed for low-power devices.<p>(Yes, I appreciate I may not be the intended audience for that board, but I would still like to build a RISC-V based desktop one of these years)
评论 #27598282 未加载
评论 #27599329 未加载
zsmialmost 4 years ago
It&#x27;s for sure an interesting result but honestly, perf&#x2F;freq is yesterday&#x27;s spec. What matters in 2021 is perf&#x2F;W and perf&#x2F;$ and there is no information on either of those metrics.
评论 #27593384 未加载
评论 #27598869 未加载
评论 #27595171 未加载
chem83almost 4 years ago
The following is speculation on my part, so I&#x27;m inviting discussion. To some extent it feels SiFive is trying to turn RISC-V into ARM by locking it up in patents while at the same time holding the keys to the ratification of the various extensions, some of which (H-extensions being good example[1]) have been stuck without much development, slowing down sw support and making it difficult to upstream[2] what has been developed so far. Meanwhile, WorldGuard is available and perhaps thriving as closed, commercial IP. It feels like there could be some conflicts of interest there and, honestly, if Intel bought SiFive, it would at least make those intentions blatantly obvious.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lwn.net&#x2F;ml&#x2F;linux-kernel&#x2F;CAAhSdy0F7gisk=FZXN7jmqFLVB3456WunwVXhkrnvNuWtrhWWA@mail.gmail.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lwn.net&#x2F;ml&#x2F;linux-kernel&#x2F;CAAhSdy0F7gisk=FZXN7jmqFLVB3...</a> [2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lists.riscv.org&#x2F;g&#x2F;tech-privileged&#x2F;topic&#x2F;risc_v_h_extension_freeze&#x2F;80346318?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate%2Fsticky,,,20,2,0,80346318" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lists.riscv.org&#x2F;g&#x2F;tech-privileged&#x2F;topic&#x2F;risc_v_h_ext...</a>
评论 #27598500 未加载
评论 #27599527 未加载
zozbot234almost 4 years ago
The press release mentions that this is a triple-issue OOO design. Probably based on BOOM v3&#x2F;SonicBOOM architecture[0], given what we know of previous SiFive designs.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;riscv-boom&#x2F;riscv-boom" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;riscv-boom&#x2F;riscv-boom</a>
评论 #27595483 未加载
nickikalmost 4 years ago
Go work with System76 and get me a RISC-V RV64GCV Laptop. That would be awesome.
评论 #27596160 未加载
评论 #27594092 未加载
truncatealmost 4 years ago
How does RISC-V places itself in market? What would be the advantage of going RISC over let say ARM (or x86)?
评论 #27596313 未加载
评论 #27596129 未加载
评论 #27598899 未加载
marcodiegoalmost 4 years ago
&gt; said Amber Huffman, Intel Fellow and CTO of IP engineering group at Intel.<p>Hope intel doesn&#x27;t infect it with IME.
评论 #27602745 未加载
评论 #27598910 未加载
nullcalmost 4 years ago
Nothing with bitmanip yet? :(
评论 #27600550 未加载