Startups using git issues to manage their roadmap?

I was on a team that tried it. It didn’t work well for us.<p>Actual issue trackers are far more efficient. Juggling pull requests, code review, and inevitable things like edit conflicts and rebases is a small price to pay for code that people are working on for hours at a time. However, it’s way too much overhead to simply manage issues. It’s not fun to have to type a lot of commands and click around code review to accomplish the same thing I can do in a few seconds with a couple clicks in an issue tracker.<p>The system also hits a dead end as soon as you want to bring non-coders into the loop. It’s not fun when your managers have to go through a coder to get guidance to interact with the issue tracker.