TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The Case for the Single Founder Startup

47 pointsby thoriealmost 14 years ago

7 comments

alexkearnsalmost 14 years ago
Paul Graham is a great guy but he is now more an investor than an entrepreneur (or at least that is how he functions with Y Combinator). We should therefore realise that when he says that he prefers to invest in companies with more than one founder, he is saying this from the perspective of an investor.<p>And from the point of view of an investor, it makes a lot of sense to have more than one founder. You invest about the same amount as you would with a single founder business but you get double or more the passionate people working desperately to make the business work.<p>From the point of view of a founder, however, things are very different. Get in a cofounder and you have immediately halved your stake and possible payout. You have also lost a lot of control. You are no longer in complete control of the company - many decisions now has to vetted by your cofounder. Not necessarily a bad thing but there is something to be said - from a self-actualisation perspective - for having complete responsibility for your destiny.
tribeofonealmost 14 years ago
The being nimble and touchy relationship stuff is nice, but the real reason you dont need a cofounder is: why split the equity 50/50, 75/25 or whatever it is? You used to need partners to share risk (mainly the infusion of capital). In this industry there are very small barriers to entry, faster returns, and <i>plenty</i> of money available if you have a good idea. Meaning there is very little risk on the part of a entrepreneur.<p>Why give up a substantial chuck of the equity for a "co-founder" when you can bring that same or similar person aboard 6 months later for a percent or two (5 at most) and get the same results.
评论 #2788878 未加载
adthrelfallalmost 14 years ago
At the very early stage it make perfect sense to just go for it and scratch that itch, but all too easy to then get burnout or bogged down in other aspects of the business. Good advice re mentors. If you're on your own, you do need to have those external sanity checks.
trevelyanalmost 14 years ago
Too bad readwriteweb doesn't cover them.
bumbledravenalmost 14 years ago
Would you sign up for the MIT Puzzle Hunt as a team of one? To build a successful startup you will have to complete challenges that are even more diverse and difficult, so why do it alone?
phyllotaxisalmost 14 years ago
This should be read by anyone with the drive to make their own future. I believe passionately in building strong relationships with as many people you can- but having someone that truly shares your type of drive is rare.<p>I think this article should be as useful to all you current co-founders, too, as a reminder of the elements to work toward in a genuinely symbiotic partnership.<p>Excellent advice.
评论 #2789179 未加载
IMorgothI12almost 14 years ago
Ycombinator not funding my startup cost them 10 million dollars.
评论 #2788825 未加载
评论 #2788712 未加载
评论 #2789941 未加载