TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

It's Me, In an Ad, On Facebook. Is This Legal? Allowed? Who Knows?

80 pointsby Dramatizealmost 14 years ago

12 comments

thinkcompalmost 14 years ago
This is pretty clear copyright infringement. Whoever took the picture owns the copyright.<p>Being a public figure would matter if this were a first amendment free speech issue, but it's not. It's just a plain violation of the Lanham Act, both due to the copyright infringement (17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq) and because of the false advertising claim (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B)) you could make because of the impression that the person endorses the ad (but I'm not a lawyer, for the record). So no, it's not legal, and illegal acts should not be allowed by any company's terms of service.<p>It's also ironic given how Facebook got its start (i.e. Facemash), which was by misusing photos copyrighted by Harvard.
评论 #2801336 未加载
johnbattellealmost 14 years ago
Guys, I think, no matter how "nice" AppSumo is in deflecting this stuff, the fact is, they've done it before, and they keep doing it. It's shady, and it's rather lame.
WordSkillalmost 14 years ago
This doesn't surprise me in the least, Appsumo is a pretty scummy operation, regardless of how much PR effort they put into cultivating the HN audience.
评论 #2801347 未加载
jdp23almost 14 years ago
Disappointing to see AppSumo using people's photos without permission.
orijingalmost 14 years ago
Per Facebook's advertising guidelines [1]:<p><i>Copyrights and trademarks Ads cannot include any content that infringes upon the rights of any third party, including copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity or other personal or proprietary right. The advertiser must have intellectual property rights to the creative and be permitted to display such creative as advertising on the Facebook Site.</i><p>So yes, it is clearly not allowed, assuming that the copyright holder has not given the advertiser the permission to use his picture.<p>[1] <a href="https://www.facebook.com/ad_guidelines.php" rel="nofollow">https://www.facebook.com/ad_guidelines.php</a>
Dramatizealmost 14 years ago
I'd be interested in Noah's response.
评论 #2801295 未加载
plasmaalmost 14 years ago
I'm not a lawyer, but I don't think you can make money off someone's "likeness" (eg, a photo!) without their content?<p>Especially a portrait shot.
评论 #2801276 未加载
stevenpalmost 14 years ago
This is not the first time that AppSumo has run an ad with a person's likeness. When a public figure has a fan page, I think it's safe to say that it's fair game (per Facebook's TOS) for Facebook advertisers to target fans of that person. I get targeted ads for authors and bands all the time that use a similar tactic. It's actually not that different from someone buying a Google ad using your name. I think what was jarring to Battelle was that he thought that AppSumo was targeting his friends, and not his "fans".
评论 #2804955 未加载
Confusionalmost 14 years ago
It's a disruptive, unorthodox, mischievous public relations hack. Also a legal and moral hack. Or at least, that's probably how they feel about it. This is the dark side of thinking outside of the established box: sometimes it's not that others don't see the outside of the box: it's that, on average, we don't want anyone to go outside the box in that way.<p>Remember: getting away with murder is hacking the justice system.
paisiblealmost 14 years ago
Not really surprised, I just went to unsusbcribe from their newsletter this morning, was getting increasingly tired of their over the top sales shpeel.
fascinatedalmost 14 years ago
Is declaring "Facebook bankruptcy" cool? I thought JB knew about this stuff?
评论 #2801370 未加载
sicularsalmost 14 years ago
I'm sure we'll hear from Noah soon enough...