TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The Case for Optimism

120 pointsby razinalmost 4 years ago

20 comments

howmayiannoyyoualmost 4 years ago
&gt; I am talking about the state of the world and its future on average global terms.<p>There is little cause for optimism on global terms. The decentralization that Kevin Kelly, Thomas Friedman and others lauded has led to a predictable increase in global insecurity by almost every measure (See below). The self-organization and techno-utopianism Kelly predicted in &quot;Out of Control&quot; (A book I loved enough to read twice) hasn&#x27;t materialized - quite the opposite in-fact.<p>International Peace Institute: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;public.tableau.com&#x2F;app&#x2F;profile&#x2F;cperry1848&#x2F;viz&#x2F;InternationalPeaceInstituteIndexofIndexes&#x2F;InternationalPeaceInstituteIndexofIndexes" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;public.tableau.com&#x2F;app&#x2F;profile&#x2F;cperry1848&#x2F;viz&#x2F;Intern...</a><p>World Bank Political Stability Rankings: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theglobaleconomy.com&#x2F;rankings&#x2F;wb_political_stability&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theglobaleconomy.com&#x2F;rankings&#x2F;wb_political_stabi...</a><p>IMF Financial Stability: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.imf.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;Publications&#x2F;GFSR?page=1" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.imf.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;Publications&#x2F;GFSR?page=1</a>
danansalmost 4 years ago
&gt; Today’s widespread middle class living standard is the result of several one-time events for the planet, such as mass migration into cities, the movement of women into the formal working economy, and pervasive automation of labor.<p>He forgot a big one: Massive use of fossil fuels, whose long term effects are, depending on where you live, threatening to undermine that very standard of living.<p>The challenge of this generation will be trying to figure out how to improve and that standard of living while undoing it&#x27;s fossil fuel dependency. That may in turn require redefining what a high standard of living is.
评论 #28193789 未加载
评论 #28193855 未加载
评论 #28194315 未加载
Mikeb85almost 4 years ago
I&#x27;m a long term optimist. Humanity always gets better, eventually.<p>The problem is we have short lifespans so small setbacks in humanity&#x27;s history are significant to those of us alive at that point in time.<p>I don&#x27;t think things will be too bad though. Governments are becoming authoritarian but there&#x27;s already enough resistance and protest, at least in some places.<p>The future is looking bright. We&#x27;ll figure out the global warming thing (probably with technology), there&#x27;s no appetite for large scale war, in many ways the world is becoming closer (thanks to technology). The main obstacle now is inequality, the tyranny of oligarchs and government corruption.
评论 #28190503 未加载
评论 #28193428 未加载
dbishalmost 4 years ago
We do need optimists if we are going to dream and build a great future. Techno-optimism has become almost a taboo, sometimes even within the groups that actually work on cutting edge tech (at least on the computing side of things). We shouldn’t be naive and ignore potential negatives of course, but more optimism and dreaming of a great future we can build towards should be encouraged.
评论 #28190604 未加载
评论 #28191258 未加载
评论 #28195269 未加载
评论 #28193955 未加载
Frickenalmost 4 years ago
&quot;you must maintain unwavering faith that you can and will prevail in the end, regardless of the difficulties, and at the same time, have the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they might be.&quot;<p>-Jim Stockdale, describing the Stockdale paradox.<p>For me to be remotely optimistic, I would need to see more people confronting those brutal facts. They are truly and properly brutal. Too brutal for the Kevin Kelly types.
评论 #28191726 未加载
评论 #28191520 未加载
legrandealmost 4 years ago
&gt; To be a good ancestor one must assume that good things can be forwarded.<p>Many of the old ways are being forgotten, and `Grandma&#x27;s brain` is not so readily picked anymore since people value their Internet &amp; the hive mind of social media more than the wisdom of their elders.<p>Also the old way of passing down teachings orally, like in the case of Buddhism and some other religions, is declining. Now it has to be perfectly preserved on the Internet so that people can refer back to it.
评论 #28191131 未加载
评论 #28191535 未加载
toss1almost 4 years ago
I love optimism, and have often been accused of adhering to it myself. To some extent, it is a requirement for civilization and even life, the basis of hope.<p>But I&#x27;ve observed from decades ago that when we look at progress in science and technology, the future looks unimaginably bright, but when we look at politics and governance, it is incredibly dark. This contrast became massively magnified since 2015.<p>Yet, even with the ascent of anti-democratic (small-&#x27;d&#x27;) forces coordinating with transnational criminal gangs masquerading as government, I have some optimism that resistance to those forces are organizing. My main question is time -- will it happen in time, or will democracy fail? If so, it&#x27;ll be some very dark centuries before it rises again. But I&#x27;m still hopeful, perhaps best to refer to it as &quot;white-knuckled optimism&quot;.
评论 #28193058 未加载
peterlkalmost 4 years ago
According to this article, I think I rank as an optimist - I tend to trust people, feel that we can solve the problems before us, etc.<p>But I&#x27;m listening to a book right now called The Ascent of Humanity, and it makes some interesting points about the philosophical axioms of the arguments presented in this article. Namely, the argument is that the technological approach - inventing our way out of problems - is doomed to failure over the long term because it creates an accelerating treadmill of required progress in order to solve the problems it creates. This is reflected in economics by the requirement that our output will continue to increase (otherwise debt doesn&#x27;t work).<p>I now look at articles like this a bit more skeptically because they assume that technological progress is necessarily good. For example, what argument could be made that painted longevity into one&#x27;s 90s as a bad thing? Well, we spend an enormous amount of human effort keeping people alive for the last few months of life. At what point is it not worth it to keep people alive any more? Perhaps culturally, we need to become better at coping with and accepting death.<p>I haven&#x27;t made up my mind on this, because the case against technology leads to some pretty bizarre conclusions. But I find it worthwhile to consider.
评论 #28190544 未加载
评论 #28190629 未加载
specialistalmost 4 years ago
I categorically approve of optimism.<p>Believing that we&#x27;ll have a future worth fighting for is like Pascal&#x27;s Wager. If we&#x27;re wrong, we won&#x27;t be around to care. And pessimism isn&#x27;t very constructive. Or fun.<p>Missing from his list is improvements is <i>governance</i>. It&#x27;s so weird that &quot;technologists&quot; rarely even think about collaborative decision making. When in fact it&#x27;s one of our most important technologies.<p>To cite one recent exciting example. Project Warp Speed betting on a portfolio of potential vaccines. Applying the smarts of NPV towards policy goals. Whereas other nations pre-picked winners, like most procurement is traditionally done.<p>Such a high visibility success will lead to wider adoption of better risk management strategies.<p>Adjacent is Musk&#x27;s $100m X-Prize bet for carbon capture. So great. For future, some sizeable fraction of all R&amp;D should be done like this.<p>&gt; <i>Optimism is not utopian. It’s protopian -- a slow march toward incremental betterment.</i><p>So much cringe. The jargon spewing technophilia of Mondo 2000, Wired, Kevin Kelly, Jaron Lanier, so many others was tired in the 1990s. (Remember &quot;Tired vs Wired&quot;? Gag.)
phenkdoalmost 4 years ago
Pessimists are usually right, and optimists usually make things happen.
评论 #28190500 未加载
TheOtherHobbesalmost 4 years ago
I used to take Kelly seriously. Back in the 90s he was boosting a glorious connected utopia of free education, explosive creativity and endless opportunity.<p>What we got was personal surveillance by huge monopolies, a toxic culture of disinformation and social media driven by &quot;engagement&quot;, and the fathomless banality of an IT economy devoted largely to ad tech.<p>And none of the real problems - climate change, wealth distribution, democratic stability - are any closer to being solved.<p>I&#x27;m out of patience. He&#x27;s always been a prophet of comforting nonsense, and this is another meaningless sermon from the top of Happy Clappy Mountain.
评论 #28191290 未加载
评论 #28191119 未加载
评论 #28191752 未加载
评论 #28191291 未加载
评论 #28191795 未加载
lazyasciiartalmost 4 years ago
Everything he says is equally applicable to belief in religion or an afterlife. The case for believing that the future will be good is that it makes you feel better. So pick whatever explanation you can swallow for this wonderful future - God, the singularity, the essential goodness of human nature, etc - and believe in it as strongly as you can.
beefmanalmost 4 years ago
Better to err on the side of optimism in each thing. Optimism in all things (the future of humanity) is different. There, we should strive to understand the dynamics of the progress that Kelly rightly admires. It&#x27;s our golden gooose. It&#x27;s prudent to understand and monitor its health; less so to blindly worship it.
Borriblealmost 4 years ago
The best case for optimism is, survivorship bias seems to have an evolutionary advantage.<p>As long as enough make it to their grandchildren...
somewhereoutthalmost 4 years ago
Given our response to Covid, I&#x27;m can&#x27;t say that I&#x27;m optimistic.<p>It is notable that HN, supposedly a meeting place for the scientifically and technically enlightend, has kept very quiet on the issue of Covid - apart from the occasional Ivermectin nonsense and similar of course.<p>No, I&#x27;m not optimistic, not at all.
discreteeventalmost 4 years ago
The article makes some good points but: &quot;the liberation of humans from their unwanted jobs&quot; shows him to be out of touch. There is a lot of manual repetitive labour that people enjoy and take pride in. And these jobs are often one of the only ways of ensuring distribution of wealth.
baron_harkonnenalmost 4 years ago
Optimism is essentially the religion of Capitalism. This is because Capitalism is perpetually in debt to tomorrow. Every start up being discussed on HN, every fund people pump their 401k into, every new oil well being dug up, all of these require believing in the future.<p>The problem is that everything we have today depends on everything being <i>better</i> tomorrow. Optimism isn&#x27;t just a nice feeling it&#x27;s a core ideology that is necessary to keep the whole machine moving forward. If people en masse started to believe tomorrow might not be better than today, and that in the day after tomorrow might be even worse... the faith in our entire system starts to collapse.<p>People here talk about pessimism as if it&#x27;s some rampant belief in society and the few optimists there are fighting against the hordes of the non-believer. But true pessimism remains a radical belief, outside of internet forums I have only occasionally met anyone who exhibits even the most mild form of pessimism. Even in academia the core works of most German philosophical pessimists remain untranslated!<p>Optimists also believe that someone questioning optimism it itself dangerous (which should be the first clue that something is not quite right with the dominant optimist world view). Whereas in practice it is optimism that allows us to perpetuate horrors on every scale without question because &quot;tomorrow it will be better!&quot;. Ecological disaster is permitted because we will solve this tomorrow and everything will be okay. Sweatshops, child labor and modern slavery are all permitted because this is just a step in peoples inevitable rises to a better life. The murder of countless civilians around the globe are all justifiable because tomorrow we will have a better world economy, and democracy will spread through the region, making everything better.<p>Under optimism the shock from any horror is neutered and any atrocity can be trivially excused because the future is bright and we are heading in the right direction. We continue to burn every more fossil fuels because we are going to be fine, we&#x27;ll figure it out, no reason for despair.<p>As the final insult to injury, questioning that future becomes heresy and so you cannot even voice your anguish as the world around you starts to collapse.
评论 #28190921 未加载
评论 #28192241 未加载
viachalmost 4 years ago
&gt; We’ve encountered nothing we can’t potentially improve<p>This statement is a bit exaggerated, saying optimistically.
评论 #28190362 未加载
pulkitsh1234almost 4 years ago
I am so far down the pessimistic rabbit hole, that for each point he mentioned my mind goes towards what to me seems like the elephant in the room.<p>&quot;Total Urbanization&quot; - What should we do with its impact on the environment ? How will total urbanization be sustainable (i.e. who will buy your waste now ?) ? Should we even think about this, or just try to build technology to leave this planet ?<p>&quot;Universal Connectivity&quot; - How do we address rise in anxiety and other mental illnesses due to this rise of total connectivity.<p>&quot;Ubiquitous AI&quot; - We all know the pitfalls here. Hint: We are not able to secure the &quot;Ubiquitous Internet&quot;, how will we secure the &quot;Ubiquitous AI&quot; ? AI related hacking incidents will be astronomically more damaging (for ex. let&#x27;s replace nurses with AI robots so that they can properly care for patients without getting tired, now this system gets deployed, obviously it will be connected to some kind of &quot;knowledge base&quot; (to train&#x2F;retrain&#x2F;get updates), what happens if this gets hacked, there would be direct impact on people&#x27;s lives). This is the same argument as cloud connected self driving cars.<p>I don&#x27;t want to go further, I hate my pessimism, I WANT to be optimistic, I don&#x27;t enjoy my pessimism, it gives me no joy. Even with so many academic disciplines, unfortunately we can only keep a bunch of them in our head to think about problems&#x2F;ideas&#x2F;etc and the ones which are left out, often that becomes the cause of my pessimism.<p>For instance, when creating the &quot;algorithm&quot; for the social media, what are the chances that they had a psychologist or even a sociologist in their team (during the nascent stages). Even if they had, did they have the same decision making powers (as MBAs ?)<p>Even if we consider &quot;Long Termism&quot;, what have we borrowed from the ancient wisdom(s) in our modern world ? Obviously we have biologically evolved from them and we can establish a chain of information going back to the ancient civilizations. But even then, we have lost lot of our touch with this very Earth itself, we lost our respect for it, we have lost our respect for the stars, our quest for industrialisation (of course with its merits) has affectively wiped lots of our ancient wisdom. In this information age, we should have been starting where things were left, but it seems like we want to start our new &quot;beginning&quot; because now we are more &quot;intelligent&quot;, now we know more laws and algorithms.<p>If we assume asteroid impacts, on large scale cataclysmic events, what kind of &quot;long termism&quot; will exist ? Even now we are finding hints that there could have been lost civilisations on earth. Their information and wisdom is now completely lost.<p>The issue I feel is that, we think the world revolves around us, we think the nature is there to provide us resources, provide us shelter, and that has lead us to completely ignore that this world, this universe was there before us and will exist after us. If we get wiped out, we get wiped out.<p>The only source of optimism I have are completely selfish points. I am grateful I can see, hear, move, feel, eat, type. I am grateful that I can have impact on lives of others directly or indirectly. I am grateful that I have a convincing experiencing of free will. I am grateful that our capitalistic society has structures in it to provide healthcare to the ill. I am grateful to have a chance to witness this reality.
评论 #28191187 未加载
EGregalmost 4 years ago
Before I clicked, I thought this was going to be an article about Optimism, the new technology for opimistic rollups for Ethereum.<p>I guess I should’t have been so optimistic :)