Be interesting how it fits in with various business compliance regulations, rules and associated risk liabilities for such compliance.<p>But the whole "Quantum", in the branding really does kinda irk me and you just know it is to help target the buzzword of the week management types in some way. Or the click-bait of the business world, yet that is who they are targeting - not your IT geeks.<p>I see a few credible customers, but nothing in the finance sticking out. When that changes, that will be a seal of approval many will look towards.
What’s nice about this is that there is now a clear baseline whenever someone pitches blockchain as a solution. $100/month is fantastically less than most of the project ideas that all require lots of labor hours to set up and maintain.<p>Every non-speculative blockchain application I’ve seen would have been met by just a distributed, immutable database. And I think the speculative use cases are morally wrong even though “make money by tricking people to buy” is uniquely met by a blockchain and not a db.
Note this is not a new offer: Released for the first time in September 10, 2019<p><a href="https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2019/09/announcing-general-availability-qldb/" rel="nofollow">https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2019/09/announcin...</a>
Relative to blockchains and since this is centralized, is there a trust issue? Sure it’s cryptographically verifiable, but is there a single entity that could somehow mess with it?