TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Why Van Halen had brown M&Ms contractually removed

184 pointsby pitdesialmost 14 years ago

15 comments

CoffeeDregsalmost 14 years ago
NOTE: to those who're reading the comments here instead of RTFA [because you're like I am...], you should RTFA.<p>I first heard this story about 3 months ago and was blown away [because everyone knew that Van Halen were prima donas, right?!]. That Van Halen plays IROC-Z rock doesn't mean they <i>aren't</i> big time business people. There are certainly outliers, but big time business people are big time business people without regard to the business and that's a lesson most of us need.<p>EDIT: I attended an alternative educational conference where the theme was "Taking Yourself Seriously". Naturally, I sat thinking "I write computer programs! I'm a serious man!". Learning about Van Halen's idiotic-but-wait-oh-my-god-that's-super-insightful contract drives home the point that I might not be taking myself seriously enough... There's always room to improve.<p>EDIT: to those who're pointing out that this is a re-hash, this is an important re-hash. Yes, it was discussed two years ago, but it bears repeating. Even an atheist, such as myself, appreciates hearing the 10 Commandments reasonably frequently.
praeclarumalmost 14 years ago
Reminds me of the Alice Cooper scene from Wayne's World.<p>I was raised to believe that these hedonistic punks knew only sex, drugs, and rock and roll. Learning that they were in fact professionals who intimately knew their craft (and, yeah, also liked to have fun) is a blessing of age.
评论 #2840255 未加载
评论 #2840270 未加载
评论 #2840078 未加载
shaggyfrogalmost 14 years ago
Repeat from about two years ago: <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=743860" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=743860</a><p>I suspect it's not the first time. It's a great story.
评论 #2839712 未加载
a1k0nalmost 14 years ago
Iggy Pop's concert rider appeared on the Smoking Gun several years ago, and it's a very amusing read -- they were clearly sick of venues screwing things up as well by not reading carefully. It's only 18 pages: <a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/lust-laughs" rel="nofollow">http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/lust-laughs</a>
评论 #2841789 未加载
quinndupontalmost 14 years ago
Back in 2009 This American Life covered the issue with aplomb. <a href="http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/386/fine-print" rel="nofollow">http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/386/f...</a>
ojillesalmost 14 years ago
Makes me think of the trick we used a large website I used to work for: we'd have everybody and their mother copy our T&#38;S because that was easier that writing it themselves. So we added a 2 very uncommon spelling mistakes into it on purpose. After that just a simple google Alert on those keywords would tell us immediately when someone copied our T&#38;S.<p>Adding something weird/uncommon can make something easily measurable (as showcased in both my example as the article).
评论 #2841356 未加载
评论 #2841497 未加载
cdcarteralmost 14 years ago
Nowadays, something like this can also be seen as somewhat insulting to a venue. We spend hours pouring over contract riders to make sure we meet the specifications, and many more hours pricing out the materials and labor necessary for an event. If the lead singer of the band is putting M&#38;M clauses into riders, instead of the touring production manager dealing with the venue TD directly, there's already something wrong with the negotiations.
评论 #2840792 未加载
评论 #2839798 未加载
评论 #2841608 未加载
评论 #2839738 未加载
评论 #2844238 未加载
评论 #2841093 未加载
评论 #2840622 未加载
mturmonalmost 14 years ago
Down for me, but<p><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20080305234616/http://jimcofer.com/personal/?p=621" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/20080305234616/http://jimcofer.co...</a><p>worked
评论 #2839750 未加载
zeteoalmost 14 years ago
The counter-argument is, of course, that someone who knows they can't fulfill all contractual clauses will try to check off the easy ones only - including the risible demand that M&#38;Ms be sorted. The argument in the article is simply invalid, because it can be used to justify everything - the more unreasonable, the better!<p>Instead of such a ridiculous demand, they could have just picked a couple of random, but useful clauses from the contract (like the number of sockets) and checked those instead. Yes, it would have taken a couple of extra minutes, but certainly a huge concert is worth that.
评论 #2840429 未加载
评论 #2839838 未加载
micheljansenalmost 14 years ago
Always assumed they were just a bunch of divas for doing this, but now it makes sense :)<p>When I was in charge of leading meetings as chairman of a study association, I used to do something similar. Every once in a while, the secretary and I would conspire to put some easter eggs in the list of decisions or action items, such as "Person X will bring a fresh, home-baked cake to the meeting on Y". If that person did not object during the meeting the minutes were accepted, it was a playful reminder to prepare for meetings, with a perk of free cake :D
smackfualmost 14 years ago
So I have a question about these riders: some of them specify a lot of specific equipment like amps and mixers... does the venue really provide that? Do they rent it, or is the listing just like a minimum spec and the artist and venue negotiate to use what is already on site at the venue?
评论 #2840999 未加载
评论 #2841087 未加载
评论 #2841021 未加载
评论 #2840980 未加载
prawnalmost 14 years ago
There was a very detailed Metallica rider online that I read some time ago. Quite entertaining. Might be this one?<p><a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/backstage/hall-fame/metallica" rel="nofollow">http://www.thesmokinggun.com/backstage/hall-fame/metallica</a>
评论 #2841443 未加载
评论 #2840631 未加载
rgloveralmost 14 years ago
This really made me want to put aside some time to read the David Lee Roth autobiography. I love learning little bits like this about people who are generally recognized as idiots in the public eye. Fantastic.
pbreitalmost 14 years ago
Seems like re-using the same stipulation wouldn't work longer term.
评论 #2839999 未加载
donnawarealmost 14 years ago
maybe we should have had van halen review the CDS contracts that nearly brought down the financial system.