If you want to support them as an individual, donate through PayPal. <a href="https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=PSNWM3WUSAZU2&source=url" rel="nofollow">https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=PSNWM3WUSAZU...</a><p>If you are an individual: Quad9 relies entirely on sponsorship and support from individuals and companies who believe in our mission, and who benefit from our protection of end users. We need resources to fight this ruling, and to continue our mission of providing security and privacy to end users. Your comments on social media to amplify the awareness of this issue and engage in civil discussion on the topic are welcome. Please help by donating via Paypal.
So it begins. Cloudflare, Google DNS and others to follow.<p>IMHO they went after quad9 because they advertise that they already block some domains, based on some lists. They'll probably argue that it's simple to add to their system.
This kind of block will stop absolutely no-one. It's just for show.<p>Edit: Source: <a href="https://www.pcworld.com/article/2047227/downloading-increases-in-the-netherlands-despite-pirate-bay-block-study-finds.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.pcworld.com/article/2047227/downloading-increase...</a>
> Providers of browsers, operating systems or antivirus software could be held liable as interferers on the same grounds if they do not prevent the accessibility of copyright-infringing websites.<p>What about providers of phone OSes that scan for illegal files against the user's wishes?