I say, more strength to her elbow - even while understanding the ultimate futility of what she is doing given the nature of what Wikipedia actually is.
Web archive link:<p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20210911162523/https://www.wired.com/story/one-womans-mission-to-rewrite-nazi-history-wikipedia/" rel="nofollow">https://web.archive.org/web/20210911162523/https://www.wired...</a>
Probably need to stop driving Volkswagons since they are carrying on the Nazi legacy of the German Labour Front then...<p>Given this long obsession to Nazi history on Wikipedia, maybe she would be also interested in spending months playing the Wolfenstein series...<p>Although I do fear that would make it worse and she may see Nazis in everything; a strange symptom I somewhat heard a couple of months ago...
"In early November 2015, you will find K.e.coffman in “20 July plot,” an article about the failed plan by German officers to assassinate Hitler. A sentence has jumped out at her. It says that some of the conspirators came to see the plot as “a grand, if futile gesture” that would save “the honour of themselves, their families, the army and Germany.” The claim isn’t supported by any sources. It’s conjecture, hearsay. And to her it seems strangely flattering."<p>How on earth is this flattering? It is the opposite! There are other examples.<p>I've never come across a page on Wikipedia organically that I'd rate as pro-Nazi.<p>It seems that we have another obsessive Wikipedia rewriter (for the good of humanity of course).