Fully agree with this assessment. Problem is that this now creates extremely destructive atmospheres. Honestly the authors of the correction should be ashamed of themselves.<p>Every set of rules will contain mistakes but the consistency of bad ideas is concerning.<p>I believe the synopsis will hold though, shining light on it will solve it eventually, even if there are still a lot of biased views in media especially.
Avoiding things like this is the reason I don't have any Code of Conduct for my public FOSS projects. [1]<p>The flip side of that is that people need to trust my vision for culture [2] and trust me to do the right thing to <i>build</i> that culture. And of course, I need to vindicate that trust.<p>There will be plenty of people who don't trust the vision or me, and that's fine. In fact, that's an expression of a free market for ideas, so I want people to be able to choose.<p>[1]: <a href="https://gavinhoward.com/2018/11/code-of-conduct-for-yzena/" rel="nofollow">https://gavinhoward.com/2018/11/code-of-conduct-for-yzena/</a><p>[2]: <a href="https://gavinhoward.com/2021/09/comments-on-cosmopolitan-and-culture/#culture" rel="nofollow">https://gavinhoward.com/2021/09/comments-on-cosmopolitan-and...</a>
What a weird section on professionalism. The social construct of professionalism re-enforces the neoliberal hegemony. Who the hell would want to do that?