This is my EuroBSDcon talk from 2 years ago. The more recent one (about getting to 400G) is up now at <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_o-HcG8QxPc" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_o-HcG8QxPc</a>
Video of the talk:<p>* <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_o-HcG8QxPc" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_o-HcG8QxPc</a><p>* <a href="https://2021.eurobsdcon.org/home/speakers/#serving" rel="nofollow">https://2021.eurobsdcon.org/home/speakers/#serving</a><p>Playlist of all the 2021 EuroBSDCon videos:<p>* <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLskKNopggjc4dadqaCDmctW-swHPD49td" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLskKNopggjc4dadqaCDmc...</a>
Related (from a more recent talk):<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28584738" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28584738</a> (<i>"Serving Netflix Video at 400Gb/s on FreeBSD [pdf]"</i>)<p>There's also an AMA by the author (in the HN thread).
I live for getting downvoted on HN so I'd just like to point out that this deck supports my previously-expressed opinion that the AMD EPYC architecture is harder to use. Out of the box, the Intel machine that is obsolete on paper was beating the EPYC machine by more than 50%.