I was discussing my project idea[0] on an online political forum.<p>One of the respondents on the form said that not everyone should get higher education. It makes students think that they are entitled for high-level jobs and that gives rise to shortage of workers for low-level jobs. Most people don't understand that "dirt and money go hand-in-hand".<p>What do you think, is this view valid?<p>[0] https://loan-free-ed.neocities.org
<i>Most people don't understand that "dirt and money go hand-in-hand".</i><p>Except it doesn't. Everybody I know (including me) who earns very good money does so by sitting in a comfortable chair, thinking clever thoughts that they then write down (or otherwise communicating them). People I know without any degree working with 'dirt' generally earn half.<p>That being said, not everybody should necessarily get a traditional 4+ year academic degree. Many people will be better served with some sort 2-3 year, more practical and focused, post high school education. Also working a few years between graduating high school and starting your further education is in many cases a good idea. But ending your education after highschool I believe is almost always a mistake.
No, everyone should not get a degree.<p>A degree is a specific kind of learning that many people does not work for many people.<p>I did a Master's degree. It was hard, I barely passed. However, being an accountant you have to do a professional qualification (CPA, CIMA, ACCA, etc). I suited that style of learning more than the masters.
> It makes students think that they are entitled for high-level jobs and that gives rise to shortage of workers for low-level jobs.<p>Education doesn't guarantee a high-level job (however we define it); but almost all high-level jobs require good education.<p>> Most people don't understand that "dirt and money go hand-in-hand".<p>This is plainly false.<p>There is something to the fact that not everyone will need or benefit from a degree but the way you're rationalising it seems off. It's like you're saying that we should keep people uneducated so they don't get too uppity about what they do in life and we have them fill the worst jobs out there that nobody wants.
Some goto higher Ed for a high paying career. Others attend college for intellectual curiosity and growth.<p>If you don’t want either of these, or prefer a different route to either of these, then yes, that seems quite ok way to live.
No, because as Charles Murray has explained in the book "Real Education" and in an essay "Intelligence and College" <a href="https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Murray%20Intelligence.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Murray%20Inte...</a> , you should have an IQ of 115 to study at the college level.
No, not everyone should get college degree. I do wish society provides a way for young (or old) people the opportunity to experience (military or civil service) something like college where they get a chance to meet/see/feel/listen to others. Trade schools don't offer that.
No, it isn't for everyone - but not in the slightest bit for the reasons your respondent is saying. It sounds like you are getting trolled. Blaming education for a labor shortage is just trying to shift the blame from the business owners trying to pay their workers less.