TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

For whom do the Covid “fact checkers” work?

55 pointsby missinfoover 3 years ago

7 comments

thrashhover 3 years ago
Every time these kind of articles come up, either from people for or against the mandates or vaccines, I want to remind everyone that you judge veracity by considering the circumstances of the source, never the source itself. The exact same words coming from someone working for a cigarette company versus someone working for a renowned research institution cannot be construed in the same way, even if they are the exact same person at two points in time.<p>Even if they do work for a cigarette company or a research institution, they also have their own biases separate from the organization that they work for.<p>Their title is only a minor consideration.
评论 #29159154 未加载
评论 #29153186 未加载
calmwormover 3 years ago
Why is this on HN? Meh.
评论 #29148656 未加载
quititover 3 years ago
For the author: The solution is to ask for their sources - not to speculate that it’s all a sham (while conveniently also not providing any data to back up such a claim.)<p>Meanwhile a single search pulls <i>a possible source</i> for the 80% figure:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cdc.gov&#x2F;coronavirus&#x2F;2019-ncov&#x2F;science&#x2F;science-briefs&#x2F;masking-science-sars-cov2.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cdc.gov&#x2F;coronavirus&#x2F;2019-ncov&#x2F;science&#x2F;science-br...</a><p>But talking about that source is inconvenient to the author because it provides ample support over a range of real world and laboratory studies (with both types demonstrating the 80% figure)<p>But even without looking deeply into this - what motive would the CDC have for making everyone run around in little fabric masks versus the very well known disinformation efforts.<p>At this stage of the pandemic: the science is abundantly clear - masks work.
评论 #29144834 未加载
评论 #29144255 未加载
评论 #29144106 未加载
评论 #29143920 未加载
评论 #29144634 未加载
评论 #29143591 未加载
charbonneau2over 3 years ago
&gt; The data in support of this is massive, and quite certain.<p><i>Continues without providing data.</i>
评论 #29143326 未加载
评论 #29153174 未加载
weakfishover 3 years ago
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mediabiasfactcheck.com&#x2F;brownstone-institute-bias&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mediabiasfactcheck.com&#x2F;brownstone-institute-bias&#x2F;</a>
评论 #29143748 未加载
评论 #29143746 未加载
评论 #29144666 未加载
ergocoderover 3 years ago
I have no idea what to believe anymore.<p>Vaccine prevents covid (e.g. death and major injury). Somehow vaccinated people are scared of unvaccinated or vaccinated-but-unmasked people. Huh?<p>Then, all schools in US are open to kids who cannot even be vaccinated (this is since a few months back).<p>If you point that out, people will counter back with covid doesn&#x27;t impact kids. Well, okay?<p>We try too hard to use unvaccinated as a scapegoat of the bad crisis management.<p>Do you remember how Fauci undermined all masks in the beginning? I do.<p>Fauci still try to pin it on unvaccinated when schools are still open..
评论 #29144117 未加载
评论 #29144021 未加载
评论 #29144137 未加载
评论 #29144710 未加载
nyxaiurover 3 years ago
Yeah, after the 6th spelling mistake in the first three paragraphs and checking the writers credentials further than the nice looking bio at the bottom I would flag it if I could.
评论 #29144226 未加载
评论 #29144745 未加载