TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The True Face of the Anti-Nuclear Movement

11 pointsby missinfoover 3 years ago

4 comments

h2odragonover 3 years ago
Oil industry funded anti-nuclear efforts and groups for years. The fact that some of them now decry the oil industry doesn't necessarily mean they're enemies; the oil industry enjoys high prices more than they hate bad PR.
credit_guyover 3 years ago
I am as pro-nuclear as they come, but I find the tone of this article a bit too inflammatory. I used to think the NRC&#x27;s licensing process is so complex only because of, you know, stupid bureaucracy. But I looked into the actual documents posted for the safety evaluation of the NuScale SMR, which you can find at [1]. I am not specialist, but there are plenty of topics that do appear to me to require serious consideration.<p>Here&#x27;s an example from the final report [2] , something about &quot;boron dilution&quot;<p><pre><code> We are concerned especially about boron dilution in the downcomer by steam condensation from the steam generators or the vessel wall because it may provide a source of unborated coolant that can migrate to the core following a perturbation. This could lead to a rapid return to power event (reactivity insertion accident) with the possibility of core damage. </code></pre> Now, it probably depends on pronunciation, but to me &quot;core damage&quot; rhymes a little with Chernobyl. I am glad that the NRC took their time to evaluate this risk, and numerous other like that.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nrc.gov&#x2F;reactors&#x2F;new-reactors&#x2F;smr&#x2F;nuscale&#x2F;ser-open-items.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nrc.gov&#x2F;reactors&#x2F;new-reactors&#x2F;smr&#x2F;nuscale&#x2F;ser-op...</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nrc.gov&#x2F;docs&#x2F;ML2021&#x2F;ML20212L586.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nrc.gov&#x2F;docs&#x2F;ML2021&#x2F;ML20212L586.pdf</a>
fsfloverover 3 years ago
See also: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=26603464" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=26603464</a><p>EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green investment label: document (reuters.com)<p>482 points by accountinhn 7 months ago | 552 comments<p>Also: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ans.org&#x2F;news&#x2F;article-1392&#x2F;robert-anderson-antinuclear-financier&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ans.org&#x2F;news&#x2F;article-1392&#x2F;robert-anderson-antinu...</a>.
fleroviumover 3 years ago
It&#x27;s hard not to ignore the fact that anti-nuclear <i>weapons</i> rhetoric has significantly picked up steam recently.[1]<p>After the pandemic, people seem to have more attention for low-risk high-impact possibilities.<p>[1] See Ken Follet&#x27;s Never, op-eds about disarmament, and political science research interest.