I understand Gill Sans (isn't it the London underground font?), which isn't quite common on Windows machines. So it seems to be Arial/Gill instead of the usual Arial/Helvetica combo…<p>Boring, but workable. Yeah, I know, Arial bad, Helvetica good! -- never got any part of that argument. Both are quite boring Grotesques… (<i>Still</i> waiting for a high-dpi monitor that can finally end the reign of the <i>sans serifs</i>)