TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Classification of Omicron (B.1.1.529): SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern

297 pointsby nycdatasciover 3 years ago

19 comments

malepoonover 3 years ago
Twitter thread from a vaccine developer: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;threadreaderapp.com&#x2F;thread&#x2F;1464222680731820043.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;threadreaderapp.com&#x2F;thread&#x2F;1464222680731820043.html</a><p>A lot of speculation still, but it&#x27;s not all bad so far.
评论 #29354578 未加载
评论 #29354276 未加载
评论 #29354083 未加载
评论 #29354326 未加载
nycdatasciover 3 years ago
&quot;In recent weeks, infections have increased steeply, coinciding with the detection of B.1.1.529 variant. The first known confirmed B.1.1.529 infection was from a specimen collected on 9 November 2021.<p>This variant has a large number of mutations, some of which are concerning. Preliminary evidence suggests an increased risk of reinfection with this variant, as compared to other VOCs. The number of cases of this variant appears to be increasing in almost all provinces in South Africa&quot;
评论 #29353523 未加载
xystover 3 years ago
My current take (not a virologist, doctor):<p>At this point, if you are not immunocompromised and you have the first vaccination and a booster. You should be able to easily recover regardless of the mutation(s). The virus would need to completely diverge from SARS-CoV-2 in order to fully defeat the countermeasures of the current vaccinations.
评论 #29353728 未加载
评论 #29353750 未加载
评论 #29353839 未加载
评论 #29354481 未加载
评论 #29354351 未加载
评论 #29354341 未加载
ethbr0over 3 years ago
Here&#x27;s the link on CoVariants (aka 21K): <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;covariants.org&#x2F;variants&#x2F;21K" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;covariants.org&#x2F;variants&#x2F;21K</a><p>Gives a better breakdown of what we&#x27;re actually talking about.
评论 #29354017 未加载
dnauticsover 3 years ago
&gt;Using this approach, this variant has been detected at faster rates than previous surges in infection, suggesting that this variant may have a growth advantage.<p>Really? I wonder how much of this is &quot;it&#x27;s very easy to spot in the pcr&quot; and we don&#x27;t have to Redeploy tests..
评论 #29354781 未加载
ashildrover 3 years ago
It is called variant of *concern* not variant of *panic*. So while it may be wise to stop travelling (European here) it is absolutely useless to speculate about the doom it brings. Doom is what we already do with ineffective measures to fight Delta (German here).
shusakuover 3 years ago
I swear I’ve read a hundred articles saying “here’s what we should’ve done to prevent this pandemic”. Let’s see if any lessons have been really learned; a new variant is practice for the next virus that comes on the scene. With the testing tech we have now, proper tracing, quarantines, and travel restrictions, could a variant be bottled up?
评论 #29355775 未加载
vletalover 3 years ago
Omicron? Was not it Nu like few hours ago? I like the longer name better. Our ministry of finance has already made a typo in a Facebook post calling it Mu (like the sound cows make).
评论 #29355262 未加载
评论 #29354489 未加载
评论 #29366354 未加载
crate_barreover 3 years ago
I gotta say, COVID releases new features faster than a lot of teams do.
评论 #29353774 未加载
评论 #29357039 未加载
评论 #29355050 未加载
评论 #29353790 未加载
评论 #29354470 未加载
nope96over 3 years ago
How was &quot;Omicron&quot; chosen as the name of this variant?
评论 #29353821 未加载
评论 #29352724 未加载
评论 #29353610 未加载
评论 #29353597 未加载
评论 #29354454 未加载
streamofdigitsover 3 years ago
still some ways to reach omega (the larger sibling of omicron)
评论 #29353894 未加载
f38zf5vdtover 3 years ago
Pronouns, the original type-hinting system.
评论 #29356272 未加载
0xcafecafeover 3 years ago
Why Omicron and not Nu?
评论 #29352845 未加载
评论 #29353023 未加载
评论 #29352610 未加载
评论 #29352776 未加载
sjg007over 3 years ago
If it replicates fast with higher viral kids and spreads easily then it will be more lethal by definition.
arthurcolleover 3 years ago
Wish they had done this after market close
jasonhanselover 3 years ago
Interesting choice to pick &quot;Omicron&quot; instead of &quot;Nu,&quot; which news outlets had been expecting them to use. Perhaps this allows them to avoid having to use &quot;Xi&quot; as the name of a Covid variant, which would have been...inconvenient for the WHO.
评论 #29353412 未加载
评论 #29353014 未加载
评论 #29353333 未加载
评论 #29353124 未加载
评论 #29353283 未加载
评论 #29353005 未加载
评论 #29353063 未加载
评论 #29353481 未加载
NoblePubliusover 3 years ago
What credibility does the WHO have at this point?
tamaharborover 3 years ago
Like the common cold or the flu, odds are the coronavirus will be with us forever in some form or another. It is unrealistic to create a vaccine for every variant. We should learn how to treat, and allow natural immunity to take over. Take the 0.07% (correction) chance of death.<p>Edit: Stupid math error.
评论 #29356860 未加载
评论 #29356827 未加载
评论 #29356889 未加载
评论 #29356818 未加载
ouidover 3 years ago
That&#x27;s a lot more mutations than we would expect to see from a naturally emerging strain, yeah?
评论 #29354096 未加载