A blast from the past: I would love to read about deliberate use of Perl 5 without CPAN, or with as little CPAN as possible.<p>Being a fan of minimal, clear languages, Lisps, Forths, Rebol etc, I've somewhat unexpectedly found myself immersed in the stuff by Perl community (perlmonks.org). I seem to like the free-form madness that surrounds this language (and the Monks), and Perl's linguistic roots and Larry Wall's thoughts on this are very interesting. Sigils and the verbosity strangely make sense to me, etc.<p>But, installed Perl is Big, at least compared to Picolisp, Rebol, or Lua.<p>I read about Microperl [1], but seems like it hasn't found (didn't find, in its day) wider usage. This philosophy -- deliberately writing Perl with a minimal amount of external dependencies -- doesn't seem very popular, aside of one-liners, which is a different thing imo. I wonder why. I've found a few contemplations [2, 3], but not much. Are people who have loved Perl first and foremost because of its syntax, semantics, TIMTOWDY etc, a tiny minority as compared to those who were dug in primarily because of CPAN?<p>And I wonder if Perl 6 (Raku) will be any different in this regard -- will its design encourage or favor minimal uses or systems a little more?<p>1: <a href="https://www.foo.be/docs/tpj/issues/vol5_3/tpj0503-0003.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.foo.be/docs/tpj/issues/vol5_3/tpj0503-0003.html</a><p>2: From 2018, "I want Circuit Perl now!": <a href="https://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=1210076" rel="nofollow">https://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=1210076</a><p>3: From 2003, on Microperl: <a href="https://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=228040" rel="nofollow">https://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=228040</a>