TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

New Zealand passes bill to allow denser, more affordable housing

51 pointsby vwoolfover 3 years ago

6 comments

pjc50over 3 years ago
Would a kiwi like to explain the "resource consent" mentioned, and how many (if any) planning regulations remain? Does this mean that people can now build anything that meets building regs, or is there a different consent process remaining?
评论 #29564429 未加载
评论 #29564059 未加载
creakingstairsover 3 years ago
I'm happy that this is happening and I hope this would slow down the price increase in a meaningful way. But I fear not much will change without introducing capital gains tax on property.
RileyJamesover 3 years ago
I hope this results in more houses built, rather than more houses “converted” into 3 premises. Having moved to Auckland in 2021, from Melbourne, I’ve seen more large houses rented as 3 “separate premises” than in Melbourne. And rent is more expensive.<p>Land blocks are big too. Even very close to the city.
pleb_nzover 3 years ago
With this public transport, this is going to get fun.
评论 #29573169 未加载
vwoolfover 3 years ago
We should be next.
PostThisTooFastover 3 years ago
They just passed a similar (actually worse) couple of laws in California, allowing up to 10 units where a single-family house stood.<p>In a place like CA, this is a corrupt developer handout. It removes approval requirements for developers and targets already-residential neighborhoods. And this is in the midst of another epic drought. These properties will cover even more ground with concrete, worsening water loss and wiping out trees.<p>Meanwhile, massive former-anchor-tenant stores like Macy&#x27;s sit boarded up in dying (or dead) malls. But did the California government target disused COMMERCIAL properties for redevelopment into high-density, walkable residences? NOPE. They didn&#x27;t even try that before voting to destroy existing residential neighborhoods.