TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

A Comparison of Bitcoin’s Environmental Impact with That of Gold and Banking

1 pointsby dadeover 3 years ago

1 comment

manuelabeledoover 3 years ago
I kind of love all these &quot;comparisons&quot;, most of which miss, consciously or not, the most obvious points. For example:<p>&gt; In 2020, ~3500 tons of gold were mined [...] This brings the gold mining industry’s 2020 total to 265 TWh of energy used.<p>Bitcoin is touted as a <i>currency</i>. If the currency doesn&#x27;t move, it becomes irrelevant.<p>But gold doesn&#x27;t need to be &quot;re-mined&quot; to stay relevant. Gold is gold, and if it were to be stored in a vault for several years, it would retain its market value.<p>And another:<p>&gt; I calculated a figure of 660 TWh of energy used by the banking system’s branches and ATMs, in addition to cotton, plastic, and metal for manufacture of notes and coins [...] Bitcoin uses 113 TWh of energy per year.<p>Bitcoin accounts for a insignificant fraction of all financial and monetary transactions, yet it uses around 1&#x2F;6 of the total electricity the banking system consumes, apparently.<p>In other words, it&#x27;s much more energy efficient to buy goods using Visa, than with Bitcoin.