This is a joke. The problem is it's a boring and derivative joke. Brainfuck is 99% of the joke, then Heartfuck goes "haha guys what if instead of <>+-.,[] we used various heart emoji?" and it just isn't nearly as funny as the original joke, Brainfuck. This is less funny than most intentionally-unfunny memes.
I wish the emoji they selected for > was visibly distinct from the emoji for -, which is also nearly indistinguishable from the emoji for +. It pains me to say this but I think this language might not be ready for prime time.
A sort of similar thing from 2020: <a href="https://jeremyrsmith.github.io/feels/" rel="nofollow">https://jeremyrsmith.github.io/feels/</a><p>The idea being that a brainf*ck-ish like program could also be incoherent screaming into the void (which I think a lot of people felt like doing in 2020)
Before clicking the link, I thought this was going to be like Brainfuck but instead of having crazy syntax that fucked with your brain, it would have crazy tooling and yak-shaving that quickly made you lose heart before ever being able to actually get a program to run and deploy.
This impedance matched my brain just enough to now get the point behind brainfuck. You could quite easily write a forth interpreter in it.<p>Could this help me understand Turing machines? Just checked... nope, they still seem weird.
Okay, but is HFaaS[1] on the roadmap? I'd ask if there is a PoC of it running Doom, but with all this love Chex Quest might be a more wholesome choice.<p>[1] - <a href="https://zserge.com/posts/bfaas/" rel="nofollow">https://zserge.com/posts/bfaas/</a>