I don’t trust the nanny state of the EU, or of any nation, to be able to block “illegal content” this way. Today it’s “think of the children” fearmongering to justify it. Tomorrow it’s gulag for anyone who isn’t on board with whatever orthodoxy takes hold of the EU.<p>Dark times ahead if someone like Macron, for example, can block content he deems illegal. They will strip people of a voice even more aggressively than they’d like to do right now.
Basic question: why are all these blocks at the DNS level?<p>If I want to block users of my network from accessing website X, why would I not block it at the IP level (level 3) by blocking all packets to all IP address that other DNS providers associate with website X?