TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The clock does not measure time; it produces it

104 pointsby metaph6over 3 years ago

29 comments

teddyhover 3 years ago
Clocks do indeed produce a culture of “time” where none such had existed before. This was observed very early:<p><pre><code> The gods confound the man who first found out how to distinguish hours! Confound him, too, who in this place set up a sundial, to cut and hack my days so wretchedly into small portions! When I was a boy, my belly was my sundial — one surer, truer, and more exact than any of them. This dial told me when ’twas proper time to go to dinner, when I had aught to eat; But nowadays, why even when I have, I can’t fall-to unless the sun gives leave. The town’s so full of these confounded dials the greatest part of the inhabitants, shrunk up with hunger, crawl along the street. </code></pre> — Plautus (c.254-184 BC)
评论 #30047514 未加载
评论 #30062319 未加载
Strilancover 3 years ago
This is really not the article for me. It&#x27;s written by someone who, I infer, agrees that Newton &quot;Destroyed the poetry of the rainbow by reducing it to a prism.&quot; [1]. And that is so alien to my experience of understanding things and defining things that I fail to relate to the text. I&#x27;m very much on the &quot;it only adds&quot; side of things [2][3].<p>That being said, consider a meeting that happens &quot;on the second Tuesday of each month&quot;. The number of days between each meeting is so haphazard and ridiculous... if you rebooted human society, that definition would not survive unchanged. <i>There&#x27;s</i> a clear example of the spandrels in our time keeping system reaching out and affecting the actions we take.<p>1: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikiquote.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;John_Keats" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikiquote.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;John_Keats</a> (search for text &quot;prism&quot;)<p>2: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.goodreads.com&#x2F;quotes&#x2F;184384-i-have-a-friend-who-s-an-artist-and-has-sometimes" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.goodreads.com&#x2F;quotes&#x2F;184384-i-have-a-friend-who-...</a><p>3: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=ZbFM3rn4ldo" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=ZbFM3rn4ldo</a>
RcouF1uZ4gsCover 3 years ago
Just as in computers, the value of a clock is that it enables efficient distributed computing and scale.<p>When you mainly interacted with a few dozen people all in the same village, how to coordinate your activities and synchronize with each other was not much of an issue. Everyone lived in close proximity and pretty much had the same culture and did the same things. If you wanted to talk with the chief, you could easily see when he had a bit of downtime and jump in.<p>However, once you are spread out, this becomes much harder. Imagine if the only way to coordinate a meeting with a teammate was to constantly poll them, asking if they are available. “Are you free, now? Are you free, now?” That basically tie up your whole day waiting for them to be free.<p>Clocks enable asynchrony. You two can quickly agree on a time, and then you can get on with your other stuff until the agreed upon time.
评论 #30046981 未加载
ezekiel68over 3 years ago
So much hand-wringing in these comments. Let me try to help: the advent society-wide timekeeping mechanims with more (sundials) and more (mechanical clocks) and more (atomic clocks) accuracy fomented the emergence of habits and patterns of interactions unimaginable by humans and their societies before these facilities became widely available. Some of these emergent properties conveyed advantages that aided conquest and empire building, not unlike Jared Diamond&#x27;s &quot;Guns, Germs, and Steel&quot;.<p>It&#x27;s kind of like watching an action movie from the 1980s with a modern teenager and trying to explain why the hero&#x2F;victim didn&#x27;t simply use their mobile phone to text or call for help. Those with the facility can literally not fathom life without it, except as some kind of vague thought experiment.
评论 #30051484 未加载
评论 #30048565 未加载
papitoover 3 years ago
Speaking of time and sleep, I have always been fascinated with the concept of &quot;first sleep, second sleep&quot;.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.com&#x2F;future&#x2F;article&#x2F;20220107-the-lost-medieval-habit-of-biphasic-sleep" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.com&#x2F;future&#x2F;article&#x2F;20220107-the-lost-medieva...</a><p>I have tried it - it&#x27;s like having TWO mornings in one day. It&#x27;s kind of amazing, but it&#x27;s completely incompatible with modern life (although less so with the new regime of more work&#x2F;life balance flexibility).
评论 #30046516 未加载
tasha0663over 3 years ago
&gt; We discipline our lives by the time on the clock.<p>That which moves in sync with the constituent parts of a clock is itself a piece of the clock. I&#x27;ve always found it a (mildly) disturbing notion that many clockwork pieces come in human shapes.
gtsopover 3 years ago
I had a very hard time following the point of this article. Didn&#x27;t make it. It felt like the template was somethink like this:<p>Step 1: Make a claim about time&#x2F;clock<p>Step 2: Throw a bunch of random facts that are true and conceptually related to time but really don&#x27;t prove at all the claim made previously.<p>Step 3: Repeat<p>Also, clocks absolutelly do measure time and not produce it. Time was a thing before clocks came to be
评论 #30046322 未加载
评论 #30046317 未加载
评论 #30046764 未加载
FrozenVoidover 3 years ago
Clocks are obviously not a social construct, its punctuality that is culture-bound variable author tries to &#x27;deconstruct&#x27; without being aware of different cultural contexts which not always work &#x27;by the clock&#x27;, e.g. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.insider.com&#x2F;how-different-cultures-see-punctuality-2016-7" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.insider.com&#x2F;how-different-cultures-see-punctuali...</a>
wruzaover 3 years ago
If you expect to read about quantum physics of time converging into &quot;the clock&quot;, this article tells none of it, it stays on a socio-biological level.
bryanrasmussenover 3 years ago
&quot;Repent, Harlequin!&quot; Said the Ticktockman. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;%22Repent,_Harlequin!%22_Said_the_Ticktockman" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;%22Repent,_Harlequin!%22_Said_...</a>
评论 #30046080 未加载
blendergeekover 3 years ago
&gt; Language such as “failure to progress” is common when a woman doesn’t perform to the expected curve, and diversion from the clock-time framework can be used to justify medical intervention. This is one of the reasons that the home-birthing movement has recently grown in popularity.<p>Of course these medical interventions have greatly reduced the number of women who die in childbirth.
评论 #30046766 未加载
评论 #30046799 未加载
评论 #30046702 未加载
dmitryminkovskyover 3 years ago
For anyone interested in reading more about this, E.P. Thompson’s <i>Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism</i> is a really good read, especially if you follow his citations to Lewis Mumford and others. Although industrial capitalism has sort of faded in some parts of the world, the insights I think are as relevant as ever. The author mentions Mumford once, but the central thesis seems taken directly from <i>Technics and Civilization</i>:<p>&gt; The clock, not the steam-engine, is the key-machine of the modern industrial age... the clock, moreover, is a piece of power-machinery whose &quot;product&quot; is seconds and minutes: by it essential nature it dissociated time from human events and helped create the belief in an independent world of mathematically measurable sequences: the special world of science.
评论 #30046474 未加载
jacobrover 3 years ago
I’m currently reading 4000 Weeks (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.goodreads.com&#x2F;book&#x2F;show&#x2F;54785515-four-thousand-weeks" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.goodreads.com&#x2F;book&#x2F;show&#x2F;54785515-four-thousand-w...</a>), which is something as interesting as a time management book that starts with a chapter quite similar to this article - explaining how time is a social construct and that you’ll probably fail if you just try to get more things done.
onecommentmanover 3 years ago
“We are “time binding” animals, as the American economist and social theorist Jeremy Rifkin put it in his 1987 book, “Time Wars.””<p>The concept of time-binding predates Rifkin by a few decades.<p>For a start, S I Hayakawa writes about Time-Binding Theory in this 1950 article “THE AIMS AND TASKS OF GENERAL SEMANTICS: Implications of the Time-Binding Theory (Part I)”<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jstor.org&#x2F;stable&#x2F;42578071" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jstor.org&#x2F;stable&#x2F;42578071</a><p>For those old enough, yes, that S I Hayakawa who was a former US Senator representing the great State of California. Some California politicians go&#x2F;are Hollywood, some write best-selling books about the nature of words, rhetoric and the psychology of humans. It’s quite a big state.<p>And Hayakawa is just expounding on the idea developed by Korzybski in the 1920s&#x2F;1930s and discussed in the foundational text for General Semantics, <i>Science and Sanity</i>.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Alfred_Korzybski" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Alfred_Korzybski</a><p>[General Semantics, which is still around, is perhaps the most mild-mannered populist intellectual movement produced by the 20th Century. If you’ve heard the phrase “the map is not the territory”, that’s General Semantics. If you wish to dig further, there is basically no emotional&#x2F;financial&#x2F;intellectual&#x2F;psychological&#x2F;social downside risk to pursuing General Semantics. There is no “ism” associated with it. It’s pretty close to an Absolute Good. Read Hayakawa’s books first.]
snowwrestlerover 3 years ago
Folks on HN talk about resisting the clock all the time without realizing it.<p>They want to work from home because the lack of commute makes for a more relaxing morning and evening. Why is it more relaxing? Because we have more time to work with. It’s more flexible.<p>Working from home also offers greater flexibility in other aspects of time. You can do domestic chores when it makes sense and not just in the hours outside office time (which are indirectly dictated by the office schedule).<p>Do you like lots of meetings? As scheduled blocks of time they are direct manifestations of the shared clock. Or do you prefer to have large blocks of unscheduled time that you can organize yourself?<p>Devs often sneer at the idea of being forced to sit at a desk for a fixed and regular set of hours every work day. “Measure my work by my output, not a time sheet”—sound familiar?<p>Knowledge work is less dependent on universal clock time than other industries like manufacturing, retail, transportation, etc. Measuring time is super important for things like how fast a web page loads, or recovering from an outage. But when it comes to developing the business itself, time is more relative. “Time to market” is not a fixed set of hours, but a relative sense of beating competitors.<p>A universal way of measuring time is obviously a useful tool, and has been critical to many advances in human society. But there is a difference between looking at a clock for your own purposes (e.g. timing your runs to measure your fitness), and looking at a clock because you are trying to satisfy someone else’s expectations. Especially when there is a power dynamic, like with employers.
评论 #30047348 未加载
vaidhyover 3 years ago
&quot;Time is a wealth of change, but the clock in its parody makes it mere change and no wealth.&quot; - Tagore.<p>While I do not agree with a lot of specifics in the article, I do sympathize with the overarching theme that we are being driven by our clocks and calendars today. If every day looks exactly same as the day before, did time pass?
评论 #30046277 未加载
garrickvanburenover 3 years ago
Clocks are an accident of latitude.<p>If the amount of daylight in higher latitudes didn&#x27;t change so dramatically throughout the year, clocks wouldn&#x27;t be needed to ensure every day is the same duration.
评论 #30047255 未加载
samatmanover 3 years ago
Since that was bad, and the topic is wonderful, may I offer something very good on this topic instead?<p>It is a book called <i>Einstein&#x27;s Dreams</i>. Thank me later.
评论 #30046507 未加载
suketkover 3 years ago
Related: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dailygood.org&#x2F;story&#x2F;1609&#x2F;against-the-clock-how-technology-has-changed-our-experience-of-time-heleo-editors&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dailygood.org&#x2F;story&#x2F;1609&#x2F;against-the-clock-how-techn...</a>
Nuzzerinoover 3 years ago
Please tell me this is a satirical inside joke in reference to the current political climate.
cormullionover 3 years ago
Clocks with a hand that circles once per day are as old as the clock itself:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;24-hour_analog_dial" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;24-hour_analog_dial</a>
评论 #30046995 未加载
achikinover 3 years ago
If clock produces time - can I create super slow clock and dodge bullets?
arandomuser1over 3 years ago
This article&#x27;s a great example (albeit an utterly ludicrous one) of how critical&#x2F;postmodern theories work. They roughly follow these steps:<p>1. Pick a random concept<p>2. Talk about how the concept doesn&#x27;t <i>always</i> apply, isn&#x27;t <i>always</i> useful, and that it contains arbitrary elements (e.g. the 7 day week)<p>3. Point out how the concept influences language, and assert or imply that language has an enourmous influence on how people behave (&quot;Contemporary society is obsessed with time — it is the most used noun in the English language&quot;)<p>4. Talk about how the concept is viewed differently in different cultures, making sure to imply that this means it&#x27;s arbitrary<p>5. Assert that the concept is rooted in colonialism, imperialism, racism, whiteness, and patriarchy.<p>6. Conclude that this means the concept is completely arbitrary, and was created by those in power for the sole purpose of oppressing others.<p>7. Pat yourself on the back, and feel proud that your genius-level intellect allows you to see how things <i>really</i> are.
nathiasover 3 years ago
really the worst invention, before they invented the clock everyone was immortal
dav_Ozover 3 years ago
Here some &quot;gems&quot;:<p>&gt;That mathematical construct has been shaped over centuries by science, yes, but also power, religion, capitalism and colonialism. The clock is extremely useful as a social tool that helps us coordinate ourselves around the things we care about, but it is also deeply politically charged. And like anything political, it benefits some, marginalizes others and blinds us from a true understanding of what is really going on.<p>&gt;During an era in which social constructs like race, gender and sexuality are being challenged and dismantled, the true nature of clock time has somehow escaped the attention of wider society. Much like has happened with money, the clock has come to be seen as the thing it was only supposed to represent: The clock has become time itself.<p>&gt;Standardized time became vital for seafarers and irresistible to corporate interests, such was the ease it could offer trade, transport and electric communication. But it took longer to colonize the minds of the general public.<p>&gt;In reality, this process had already been taking place throughout the 1800s as a result of European colonialism, imperialism and oppression. Colonialism was not just a conquest of land, and therefore space, but also a conquest of time. From South Asia to Africa to Oceania, imperialists assaulted alternative forms of timekeeping. They saw any region without European-style clocks, watches and church bells as a land without time.<p>&gt;The Western separation of clock time from the rhythms of nature helped imperialists establish superiority over other cultures.<p>&gt;Even the most natural of processes now must be expressed in clock time in order for them to be validated<p>&gt;Women in particular often find themselves at the wrong end of this arbitrary metric. Unpaid labor such as housework and childcare — which still disproportionately burdens women — seems to slip between the measurements of the clock, whereas the experience of pregnancy is very much under the scrutiny of clock time. Adam quotes a woman’s account of her birth-giving experience: “The woman in labor, forced by the intensity of the contractions to turn all her attention to them, loses her ordinary, intimate contact with clock time.” But in the hospital environment, where the natural process of childbirth has been evaluated and standardized in clock-time units, a woman is pressured to follow what Alys Einion-Waller, a professor of midwifery at Swansea University, has called a “medicalized birth script.”<p>&gt;Clock time may have colonized the planet, but it did not completely destroy alternative traditions of timekeeping. Certain religions maintain a connection to time that is rooted in nature, like salat in Islam and zmanim in Judaism, in which prayer times are defined by natural phenomena like dawn, dusk and the positioning of stars. The timing of these events may be converted into clock time, but they are not determined by clocks.<p>This is such a mess, the writer is constantly mixing up the concepts of clock, clock time, standardized time, geological time, earth rotating, circadian time... which he does not bother to differentiate making it easy to come to his programmatically set conclusions of oppressor and oppressed.<p>The cultural aspect of timekeeping going back to humans wondering about the regularities in sun movmement at day and about the &quot;other suns&quot; and objects at night is quite fascinating and probably as &quot;astronomy&quot; the oldest preform of science in reproducibility and predictive power (astrology aside :D); to butcher it up in such a manner, imho a very poor choice.<p>For anyone interested in appreciating the art of keeping track of time I would suggest looking up the two millennia old &quot;astrolabe&quot;[0]<p>[0]<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;m.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=yioZhHe1i5M" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;m.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=yioZhHe1i5M</a>
krisoftover 3 years ago
&gt; We usually eat our meals at appropriate clock times as opposed to whenever we are hungry, go to sleep at appropriate clock times as opposed to whenever we are tired<p>Well then you are doing it wrong. If you do stupid things don&#x27;t blame the clock for it. :D
评论 #30046042 未加载
评论 #30046724 未加载
评论 #30046118 未加载
评论 #30046383 未加载
评论 #30047185 未加载
评论 #30046377 未加载
robwwilliamsover 3 years ago
Oh so woke: “The Western separation of clock time from the rhythms of nature helped imperialists establish superiority over other cultures.”<p>Please: time is a necessary convention for virtually any complex society, and this drive or imposition to coordinate and predict events accurately goes back to any large culture, including most larger ancient civilizations; west, east, north, south.<p>Time control (aka, coordination of activity) has always bern critical in warfare, navigation, feasts, and fun social interactions.<p>What has changed is the precision and accuracy and near-synchrony that can now be achieved at a global scale.<p>The parent article adds much too much “Strum und Drang” about bad modern trends that divorce us from our pristine noble primitive and organic state. Right ;-)
评论 #30047267 未加载
评论 #30048883 未加载
评论 #30047432 未加载
blueflowover 3 years ago
Fucking white people and their... <i>shuffles deck, pulls card</i> ... methods of timekeeping.<p>Out of all things, the author picked time to pick on. Time is one of the few physical things that are objective and real and still can be quite directly experienced by all humans regardless of cultural context or biases.<p>Nonsense article.
评论 #30046305 未加载
评论 #30046110 未加载
评论 #30046038 未加载
评论 #30046145 未加载
评论 #30046878 未加载
评论 #30047165 未加载
评论 #30046094 未加载
评论 #30046855 未加载
评论 #30046765 未加载
评论 #30046863 未加载
评论 #30046329 未加载
评论 #30046551 未加载
评论 #30047052 未加载
评论 #30046445 未加载
评论 #30046154 未加载
评论 #30046391 未加载
Flankkover 3 years ago
O clock, how ye astounds. As the fourth hour striketh I am unabashedly reminded of his whiteness; wherefrom dost thou find such disregard for aboriginal astronomy?