TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: Where are you going to find long-form content online these days?

179 pointsby nrs26over 3 years ago
Obviously, outside of Hacker News.

58 comments

sharmiover 3 years ago
A cautionary message from someone who used to think long form content equals quality and indepth coverage:<p>Long form content in magazines still used to have limited pages. So there needed to be a balance between information and prose. So even in long prose, the content was well edited, every sentence brought something important to the table.<p>Nowadays, on the web, an article could have infinite length without any limits. Less editing skills required and more importantly, the longer you stay on page, the better their metrics.<p>So the content tends to be way longer with more passages that do not really add anything to the central message. Most of them are approaching novellas in length.<p>At one point in time, this became such a big time sink for me, I wrote a firefox extension to warn me how long the page was and how long I spent on it. I am a moderately good reader and still some of these articles would typically take 45 mins to finish.<p>One heuristic I follow nowadays: Before reading, I think about what my purpose of this article is, what I hope to learn from this exercise: (It could just even be entertainment)<p>A few mins in, I see if this purpose is being fulfilled. If yes, I continue. If not, I just bail out.
评论 #30055272 未加载
评论 #30057385 未加载
评论 #30071908 未加载
评论 #30062441 未加载
unfoldingover 3 years ago
I really like the Astral Codex blog[1]. It is rationalist blog that features a variety of long-form posts, book reviews, discussions, etc. I don&#x27;t really know if I consider myself a rationalist or not but I find the posts, discussions, and community to be very stimulating.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;astralcodexten.substack.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;astralcodexten.substack.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #30053846 未加载
评论 #30053774 未加载
wnolensover 3 years ago
Non-tech and non-news (and not even that long), but I have to plug <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.themarginalian.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.themarginalian.org&#x2F;</a> (previously called &quot;brain pickings&quot;).<p>The author reads voraciously and follows common threads across many works, compiling her thoughts into articles which often contain beautiful prose in their own right. I often pickup book recs from here that get me into reading about art, poetry, love, spirituality, and more, which I never would otherwise.
评论 #30054968 未加载
Veenover 3 years ago
Three Quarks Daily often surfaces high-quality long form content from a broad ideological cross-section. As others have mentioned, Arts and Letters Daily is often interesting too.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;3quarksdaily.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;3quarksdaily.com&#x2F;</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aldaily.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aldaily.com&#x2F;</a><p>And, while I&#x27;m commenting, some of my favorite Substacks who tend to write long content are:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;freddiedeboer.substack.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;freddiedeboer.substack.com&#x2F;</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;justinehsmith.substack.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;justinehsmith.substack.com&#x2F;</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;astralcodexten.substack.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;astralcodexten.substack.com&#x2F;</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;razib.substack.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;razib.substack.com&#x2F;</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theinsight.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theinsight.org&#x2F;</a>
kp25over 3 years ago
- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;waitbutwhy.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;waitbutwhy.com&#x2F;</a> by Tim Urban<p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;moretothat.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;moretothat.com&#x2F;</a> by Lawrence Yeo<p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;psyche.co&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;psyche.co&#x2F;</a><p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;aeon.co&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;aeon.co&#x2F;</a><p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quantamagazine.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quantamagazine.org&#x2F;</a><p>I didn&#x27;t realise till now, I read at least 2-3 articles a week from the above list. Well written long form content.
adonovanover 3 years ago
London Review of Books. It’s a print magazine mirrored on its website, but do yourself a favor and leave your phone beyond reach while trying to read long-form. The internet has ruined us all.
评论 #30052847 未加载
评论 #30054610 未加载
评论 #30053141 未加载
yesenadamover 3 years ago
Books are available free at:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.org&#x2F;</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;libgen.rs&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;libgen.rs&#x2F;</a><p>Archive.org tends to have out-of-copyright stuff, LibGen newer stuff, but stuff in between (mid to late 20th C) you can often get by &quot;borrowing&quot; the ebook from archive.org for a short time (free, requires sign-up.) LibGen also has the vast majority of scientific papers&#x2F;journal articles I look for, no matter how old or obscure.
评论 #30054275 未加载
评论 #30054273 未加载
650over 3 years ago
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;astralcodexten.substack.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;astralcodexten.substack.com&#x2F;</a><p>formerly known as Slate Star Codex prior to doxxing by Cade Metz at the New York Times.
waingakeover 3 years ago
The New Yorker is great <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.newyorker.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.newyorker.com</a>. Amazing writing, so much so that I can be pulled into articles that I wouldn&#x27;t expect to be interested in. I had a Kindle subscription, but liked it so much I forked out for a print subscription. I find it a real struggle reading long form articles digitally.
评论 #30054665 未加载
评论 #30054797 未加载
geoblackover 3 years ago
The only thing I resent about moving to ebooks from the library is time I wasted on second rate content from the internet.<p>I have seven library cards and I can read almost anything for free. If none have what I want, they will often order it and notify me when it arrives. All from my sweet Gesture chair. Also Kanopy has wonderful classes for free.
评论 #30053362 未加载
评论 #30053401 未加载
mtmailover 3 years ago
I quite enjoy <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;restofworld.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;restofworld.org&#x2F;</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.instapaper.com&#x2F;daily" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.instapaper.com&#x2F;daily</a> (contains some automated spamming, flooding submissions to trick the popularity scoring I guess)
评论 #30052170 未加载
projektfuover 3 years ago
Still the same old places mostly. Harper&#x27;s. Rolling Stone. NY Review of Books. Lots of podcasts, especially ones that go through a long story in several episodes, for example &quot;Deep Cover&quot; and &quot;Buried Truths&quot;. Books.<p>I&#x27;m getting tired of long-form content that wanders around the point. That&#x27;s just taking a small subject and adding words. I like long form when the subject demands it and its complexity makes the long form useful.
dgellowover 3 years ago
In the past few months I spent a lot of time consuming content from these two sources:<p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;fasterthanli.me" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;fasterthanli.me</a>, already quite popular on HN. Amos articles are often really long and have lot of details, they read like adventures and I love that.<p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;devblogs.microsoft.com&#x2F;oldnewthing" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;devblogs.microsoft.com&#x2F;oldnewthing</a>, Old New Thing by Raymond Chen at Microsoft. He’s writing articles since ~20 years and has a lot of really cool anecdotes regarding low level Windows stuff.<p>I stopped trying to find platforms with long form content, personal blogs is the only thing that works for me (and HN, but that’s an addiction more than anything else :p).
CodeGlitchover 3 years ago
Podcasts.<p>TRIGGERnometry: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;audioboom.com&#x2F;channels&#x2F;4991237.rss" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;audioboom.com&#x2F;channels&#x2F;4991237.rss</a><p>Lex Fridman Podcast: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lexfridman.com&#x2F;feed&#x2F;podcast&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lexfridman.com&#x2F;feed&#x2F;podcast&#x2F;</a><p>Science &amp; Futurism with Isaac Arthur: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;feeds.soundcloud.com&#x2F;users&#x2F;soundcloud:users:234608349&#x2F;sounds.rss" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;feeds.soundcloud.com&#x2F;users&#x2F;soundcloud:users:23460834...</a><p>The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;feeds.megaphone.fm&#x2F;ADV2256857693" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;feeds.megaphone.fm&#x2F;ADV2256857693</a>
评论 #30055013 未加载
评论 #30054933 未加载
chillpenguinover 3 years ago
I like The Economist. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.economist.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.economist.com&#x2F;</a>
Zmajcheover 3 years ago
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;waitbutwhy.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;waitbutwhy.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #30052991 未加载
goatkeyover 3 years ago
The Browser: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;thebrowser.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;thebrowser.com&#x2F;</a><p>Arts and Letters Daily: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aldaily.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aldaily.com&#x2F;</a><p>Lit mags: LRB, NYRB, Paris Review, McSweeneys<p>Lit-adjacent mags: Harpers, Laphams Quarterly<p>I usually follow a lot of these via RSS, and subscribe to some.<p>Beyond that, several newsletters. Astral códex ten (as already mentioned) and tomas pueyo’s uncharted territories come to mind.<p>The Browser is easily the best reading money I’ve spent in a long time. $5&#x2F;mo and it finds such good articles.
herskoover 3 years ago
The Joe Rogan podcast. Listening to long-form, multi-hour conversation is so refreshing compared to what traditional news shows have become.
评论 #30052969 未加载
评论 #30053626 未加载
评论 #30053699 未加载
评论 #30053840 未加载
评论 #30052882 未加载
stephenhueyover 3 years ago
Some of my favorites have already been mentioned: The New Yorker, The Atlantic, The Economist. But one missing jewel of great long-form stories told with excellent writing is:<p>Texas Monthly<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.texasmonthly.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.texasmonthly.com&#x2F;</a>
kirsoover 3 years ago
I love finance biographies from Neckar, its more of a longer newsletter but stories are fascinating: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;neckar.substack.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;neckar.substack.com&#x2F;</a><p>Its not sensational, but just well researched and put together. A good example is bootstrapping buyouts: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;neckar.substack.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;reginald-lewis-bootstrapping-buyouts" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;neckar.substack.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;reginald-lewis-bootstrapping-b...</a><p>Cedric&#x27;s commoncog already mentioned here.<p>And second these resources:<p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;waitbutwhy.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;waitbutwhy.com&#x2F;</a> by Tim Urban<p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;moretothat.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;moretothat.com&#x2F;</a> by Lawrence Yeo<p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;psyche.co&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;psyche.co&#x2F;</a><p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;aeon.co&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;aeon.co&#x2F;</a><p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quantamagazine.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quantamagazine.org&#x2F;</a>
pkcsecurityover 3 years ago
The New Yorker is great too, if you’re willing to pay a few bucks a month.
评论 #30053289 未加载
dredmorbiusover 3 years ago
Books.<p>My general preference these days is non-fiction. For discovery methods see this comment: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=29609479" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=29609479</a><p>Generally my problem is far too <i>much</i> content and not enough time, rather than the reverse.<p>Online content seems to have rapidly diminishing quality. Search and discovery tools are increasingly disappointing.<p>More on general &quot;finding stuff&quot; here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tildes.net&#x2F;~misc&#x2F;szx&#x2F;what_tips_or_tricks_do_you_use_when_researching_a_topic_to_find_actually_useful_information#comment-5sou" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tildes.net&#x2F;~misc&#x2F;szx&#x2F;what_tips_or_tricks_do_you_use_...</a>
zwogover 3 years ago
I like aeon.co - a collection of essays, thinkpieces and articles about a wide range of topics
env123over 3 years ago
As much as The Economist is good, it&#x27;s still news, which has negative effects on the mind + it&#x27;s too focused on global economy which don&#x27;t really have any value for me, maybe to an actual economist&#x2F;global leader, it would<p>XXX Review of Books are good, but they&#x27;re basically convoluted essays. Good for anybody else, not for my time though<p>Aeon focuses much on philosophy. I no longer read this though because it&#x27;s too academic for my taste<p>Brain Pickings, Arts &amp; Daily, 3 Quarks Daily focuses much on classics, mostly - I&#x27;d rather read classics that reading writings about classics, nowadays
评论 #30056920 未加载
LoveMortuusover 3 years ago
Important quote to not forget: &quot;If I had more time I would have written a shorter letter&quot;<p>Meaning quantity =&#x2F;= quality. That being said, a lot of short content today has near zero quality.<p>When TikTok reached first place on the DNS thingy, I decided to try it, so as to not feel like I&#x27;m out of touch. My findings were that TikTok works on disappointment, it&#x27;s going to show you low quality content for so long that you drop your expectations to almost zero, which means that when you do eventually see some content with at least a bit of effort put into it, it gives you a dopamine hit and you feel like it was all worth it. I personally have not been able to find any usefulness from the app except consuming time, which it&#x27;s great at. But if you&#x27;ve got a lot of time to waste you might as well be reading a book or something, not sure. I haven&#x27;t really been able to fit TikTok into my life, but I don&#x27;t really feel like I&#x27;m missing anything.<p>Also food for thought: &quot;YouTube used to have much more short form content, but then the algorithm forced many to making videos that are at least 10 min long. Doing that YouTube removed enough creators for a platform like TikTok to be viable and successful. Now YouTube introduced YouTube Shorts. Think...&quot; (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;LoveMortuus&#x2F;status&#x2F;1485258235137429507?t=XSUDBTSAOyRtMKqTh4x5kw&amp;s=19" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;LoveMortuus&#x2F;status&#x2F;1485258235137429507?t...</a>)
pmoriartyover 3 years ago
The Atlantic has some of the highest quality long-form content I&#x27;ve ever read in my life. It&#x27;s not all excellent, but quite often it is. Highly recommended.
0x008over 3 years ago
The New York Times writes great articles and usually you get a discount so it only costs 1 or 2$ per week which I find really fair pricing.<p>Also popular substack Newsletters. It totally depends though, some are just hot air even in the paid versions and others really have good content also for free subscribers.<p>If there is more need for content I will go through my list of 100+ blogs and just grab some random old article about compiling gtk on gentoo or similar… haha
paisawallaover 3 years ago
My pipeline of interesting Twitter users&#x2F;threads to Substack mailing lists has served me well. I recently discovered Google Assistant&#x27;s &quot;read this article aloud&quot; functionality and it&#x27;s been amazing to help cut down the backlog of unread newsletter emails. The experience is quite good, makes a newsletter feel almost like a podcast.
input_shover 3 years ago
I find them either on <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;longreads.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;longreads.com&#x2F;</a> or in a couple of indie magazines I follow (like for example this one: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;logicmag.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;logicmag.io&#x2F;</a>)
评论 #30055221 未加载
LeoPantheraover 3 years ago
I subscribe to Apple News, which includes access to a large number of magazines, and I have an electronic subscription to a couple of newspapers. My morning routine is reading from these sources on my iPad... and a coffee. :)
stereoradoncover 3 years ago
You can join here for the best reads that I curate manually for the long-form: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;t.me&#x2F;+pwdYcfBiV1I3Njll" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;t.me&#x2F;+pwdYcfBiV1I3Njll</a><p>This is on Telegram and will require admin approval. I had to keep this as a private channel. I read a lot; if I find (and come across) good book recommendations, I post them too (including the books). You can save content locally, but the channel is restricted to disallow forwarding.<p>This is intentional, because once I plan for comments and group discussions, I need something more substantial than fluff.
评论 #30062418 未加载
jlcoffover 3 years ago
Unpopular opinions: the pirate bay.
neilpanchalover 3 years ago
Cabinet Magazine: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cabinetmagazine.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cabinetmagazine.org&#x2F;</a>
randycupertinoover 3 years ago
&#x2F;r&#x2F;TrueReddit and &#x2F;r&#x2F;FoodforThought subreddits are both pretty interesting and tend to have insightful long-form articles.
GekkePrutserover 3 years ago
Substack for blogs. They have some famous people like Snowden.<p>Medium is more popular but they constantly bug youto subscribe and have too much tracking.
rkiqueover 3 years ago
I go on Quora. I don&#x27;t really like their digest emails or any of their recent monetization efforts but it&#x27;s still unparalleled in free high quality writing, especially if you follow the right people. It remains one of the best places to find interesting stories and explanations, and also for exposure to a wide range of human experiences.
ocdtrekkieover 3 years ago
I really prefer interesting blog posts. While I use HN and Twitter and such often to find interesting links, if I find one, and it&#x27;s part of a blog, I usually take the opportunity to pull it&#x27;s feed into my RSS reader, since other content on the same site is likely of similar quality.
valyagolevover 3 years ago
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aldaily.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aldaily.com&#x2F;</a> Arts&amp;Letters daily was a curated collection of links that introduced many to highbrow internet longform. Not sure how it does those days
Havocover 3 years ago
Not sure it counts as long form since it isn’t written but I’ve been loving YouTube documentaries on big infrastructure projects and geopolitics issues. There are a handful of small content creators cranking out quality content in these areas
评论 #30055734 未加载
somedangednameover 3 years ago
It&#x27;s a bit niche but for reading about military history I&#x27;ve really been enjoying <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;acoup.blog" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;acoup.blog</a>.
nscalfover 3 years ago
I&#x27;ve been liking Packy&#x27;s writing over at Not Boring (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.notboring.co&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.notboring.co&#x2F;</a>).
desaigudduover 3 years ago
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;fiftytwo.in" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;fiftytwo.in</a> [Largely India focused stories]<p>Worked with this company for building their Newsroom Workflow solution.
elibenover 3 years ago
Books<p>Seriously. Books are the ultimate long-form content; their authors typically spend years researching and writing them, and you can sample many reviews before committing to read one.
评论 #30054326 未加载
评论 #30054203 未加载
评论 #30054253 未加载
评论 #30055259 未加载
NaOHover 3 years ago
The Sunday Long Read has been a great resource for many years now.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sundaylongread.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sundaylongread.com</a>
owensmpover 3 years ago
More recent but solid compilation of writing - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fairobserver.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fairobserver.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #30078903 未加载
jerome-jhover 3 years ago
Read research papers on a topic of interest to you.<p>As of now I try to limit the time I spend on HN. I skim through articles very quickly. OTOH I recently reorganized my collection of research papers, most of them obtained thanks to that Kazakhstani heroïcal woman. I pick one and read it from start to finish, over the course of a week, a month, whatever. I often do not understand what I read. Little by little, reading again after a few months the same article, I understand one paragraph more :)<p>The two golden rules:<p>- stick to the most important, breakthrough papers<p>- read a paper from start to finish, even if you do not understand it. Do not block, just keep reading.
bricemoover 3 years ago
The Information is the best long form content on tech news and analysis that I believe exists. Pricey but worth it. Surprised no one else has mentioned it.
gorbachevover 3 years ago
I&#x27;ve been subscribing to <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;longreads.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;longreads.com&#x2F;</a> for a while.
jozzasover 3 years ago
longform.org used to be my go-to, but they have stopped curating long form content. Would be interested if anyone could recommend a replacement.
ChrisMarshallNYover 3 years ago
I have over 400 books on my iPad. A significant number are various tech tomes, but I also like to read “escapist junk”; mostly fantasy.
silisiliover 3 years ago
I like a lot of David Perell&#x27;s writings. Usually you&#x27;ll learn at least one thing from each.<p>www.perell.com
dustedover 3 years ago
HN, the youtube channels I subscribe to, twitch.tv, netflix.<p>But I&#x27;ll repeat what others said, that long form != high quality, especially netflix documentaries are so bad that I simply will not watch them, they seem to be optimized only to waste your time, and somehow always manage to avoid leaking any information at all.
gwhlover 3 years ago
Books. They&#x27;re called books.
sailorganymedeover 3 years ago
Are.na has occasional long reads
walrus01over 3 years ago
Metafilter: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.metafilter.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.metafilter.com&#x2F;</a>
lvsover 3 years ago
Have you heard of books?
评论 #30052649 未加载
评论 #30052910 未加载
评论 #30053120 未加载
1680168lover 3 years ago
Sermons.
jsiaajdsdaaover 3 years ago
I think I&#x27;m fundamentally opposed to long form content. I can learn a lot more from one line of code than 10 pages of theory.