I strongly dislike the trend of doomer climate articles providing the reader no information on how to act. We're facing the largest threat to humanity in history. One that requires large reforms to how we live our life to secure a comfortable & biodiverse world for future generations. (Notice: I didnt say liveable world, humans will still be around past 2100, but I rather have a world with less extreme heat, thanks. I would also like if my grandkids could ski too.)<p>I am involved in the climate movement, I know what to do, but imagine how hopeless an average reader might feel after seeing this headline. They might come to wrong conclusions such as "oh I better eat less fish!" No! Get your government to do something. Their carbon footprint is far greater then any one individual.<p>Feels like a moral wrong to throw this terryfying information on to a readers lap & provide them no ways to take action.