Verus vel interdum mendacium.<p>Poor Veritasium. Makes a wild claim that everyone else is wrong but doesn't back it up with experimental evidence.<p>It reminds me of how cocky people, like doctors or conspiracy theorists, are able to seem convinced/ing while professing a claim with gusto but are actually full of shit. Seems like something Mark Rober would do, i.e., staging scenes like a reality TV show.
For anybody who does not want to review both videos, although you should, here is the explanation:<p>"Water’s Polarity"<p>"One of water’s important properties is that it is composed of polar molecules. The two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom within water molecules (H2O) form polar covalent bonds. While there is no net charge to a water molecule, the polarity of water creates a slightly positive charge on hydrogen and a slightly negative charge on oxygen, contributing to water’s properties of attraction. Water’s charges are generated because oxygen is more electronegative, or electron loving, than hydrogen. Thus, it is more likely that a shared electron would be found near the oxygen nucleus than the hydrogen nucleus. Since water is a nonlinear, or bent, molecule, the difference in electronegativities between the oxygen and hydrogen atoms generates the partial negative charge near the oxygen and partial positive charges near both hydrogens."<p><a href="https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_General_Biology/Book%3A_General_Biology_(Boundless)/02%3A_The_Chemical_Foundation_of_Life/2.2%3A_Water/2.2A%3A_Waters_Polarity#:~:text=One%20of%20water's%20important%20properties,is%20composed%20of%20polar%20molecules.&text=While%20there%20is%20no%20net,to%20water's%20properties%20of%20attraction" rel="nofollow">https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_Gene...</a>.<p>"Bending Water"<p><a href="https://www.ucl.ac.uk/chemsea/experiments.php?exp_n=2" rel="nofollow">https://www.ucl.ac.uk/chemsea/experiments.php?exp_n=2</a>