The Telegram bot is an amazing idea/feature! Especially because I noticed that a lot of how much I use these apps depends on how little friction there is to using them. I'd love to organise the random notes I take throughout the day better but always end up writing random google keep notes because it's just so fast and convenient.
An important part of my workflow[1] is similar to this approach. I believe it's got a lot of potential if done right. One concern I have is the lack of file upload support (I only see images) and that querying relies heavily on tags. WRT the latter, it didn't work until I was able to create new projects that only held notes related to a specific project/topic. The current trend of dumping everything into one big database and hoping for the best when it comes to review and retrieval just does not work for me.<p>[1] Based on what I can tell from the linked page, which doesn't give a ton of detail.
This is interesting -- it reminds me a lot of <a href="https://supernotes.app" rel="nofollow">https://supernotes.app</a>.<p>I like how simple and small this is, as well as its support for history out of the gates. :)
This looks like something I am looking for; not quite sure yet, though.<p>- Does it support writing code?
- Can I use it in an European corporate setting (privacy, data protection, SSO, etc.)? Or given that it is in beta, do you have plans in that regard?
- Does it support concurrent editing?
That is a beautifully simple and informative landing page! I especially like that there isn't a clutter of menu options. You scroll and click on what looks interesting to you. I'm guessing someone will complain the link to the documentation is at the bottom, but for an early stage where acquisition matters, this is so clean. It forces me to learn about the app rather than making me focus on the site structure. Another bonus is the lack of complex movement and parallax effects.<p>RSS is a nice extra.<p>Is there a way to demo the example in graph mode without logging in?<p>One annoyance: in the web example, the full row is clickable for tags to expand, but then you have to click the text on the sub-tag (despite the full row being highlighted).
Looks well-executed and the free plan is very generous with unlimited notes compared to other recent note-taking services.<p>But for knowledge management, I still think a local-only application is much better for privacy and more control.
I started making something similar back in the time when I was trying to learn some php (self-hosted LAMP setup). Stopped mostly because I wasn't able to find a proper English dictionary for NLP.<p>Second reason was the inconvenience of opening my local webpage and clicking "new entry", then selecting from my tag suggestions or adding a few more new tags.. every time I wanted to add a new note.<p>Creating a new text document, copy-pasting into it, then closing it and clicking yes to save, then drag and dropping it onto my "notes" folder on my Desktop, somehow seems easier... No titles, no tags, but I could always rest assured that, when I'll need it, It would be there, somewhere in that "notes" folder, even years later.<p>Jokes aside, I didn't actually realize people are into these "knowledge management" systems.<p>I was wondering if one were to open source a self-hosted app like this, what license you could chose such that individual people would be able to install/modify/use/etc a copy for personal use, even commercial, even if employed, even work computers. Yet disallow a company from modifying/customizig/deploying it for multiple employees, have the company pay a formal fee? Are there any examples of such licenses in the wild?
The graph view for <i>notes</i> is not helpful because it shows a bunch of gibberish like date, url?, etc. Perhaps add a Title field on notes so that we can control what shows up on the graph view?<p>Also [this page](<a href="https://docs.windi.app/taking-notes/bidirectional-links" rel="nofollow">https://docs.windi.app/taking-notes/bidirectional-links</a>) does not actually explain how to create a link. I guessed and put a notes URL into a different note's markdown link. Is there a shorthand for linking notes or do you just use the note's full URL?
“ You don't need to have a structure in mind before writing. Just focus on ideas; the structure will emerge.”<p>I’ve been obsessing over this idea for a while now. Never got around to implementing anything, but I really like the thought of just barfing things into my keyboard and having it all available at the speed of thought.<p>Hope you achieve some success to this end :)
So, is this the evolution of Snippet? I read about Snippet here <a href="https://secondorder.xyz/posts/introducing-snippet/" rel="nofollow">https://secondorder.xyz/posts/introducing-snippet/</a>, but the repository is non-existing now (404).
The name really stuck out to me, it's also the name of a product you stick up a babies butt[1]<p><a href="https://frida.com/products/windi" rel="nofollow">https://frida.com/products/windi</a>
Meta: this has been bugging me for ages as I see it becoming more and more common (I think it’s over half of such “Show HN” sites with their own domains now that are blank for me, a JavaScript-disabler-by-default mostly for performance), but I’ve never asked anyone; why do you use Next.js for the marketing website, rather than just writing HTML? As it stands, the page is blank if one doesn’t execute JavaScript, and it’s executing almost a megabyte of JavaScript where as far as I can tell the <i>only</i> thing it’s doing that straight HTML with <i>no</i> JavaScript couldn’t do is the spinning globe. This just seems like a terrible fit for client-side rendering, unambiguously worse for the client (slower to load, less reliable, and excluding various users and bots—even Googlebot doesn’t always execute JavaScript, only after a while in general, I think), and I wouldn’t have <i>thought</i> that it would be any easier for the developers. So I’m curious: firstly, am I missing something and the use of Next.js actually <i>does</i> make life much easier for the developers, even for what should be simple HTML like this? And secondly, is there some reason why almost no one seems to be enabling server-side rendering or generation when they use Next.js like this? (I thought those features were a key part of why people would <i>choose</i> Next.js, and would have assumed from what I had heard that SSR would be enabled by default, but maybe not?)<p>(Personal context: plenty of web frontend and backend experience, but no React, as I’ve favoured lighter things, such as Svelte for the last few years; and I tend to just write straight HTML, possibly with simple templating. I’m not seeking to criticise or condemn here, just to understand. I understand why you’d depend on JS for web apps, just not for simple marketing sites.)
To me, and presumably other parents in NA and the EU, a Windi is a small plastic tube device that you insert into the rectum of a baby to relieve gas pressure: <a href="https://frida.com/products/windi" rel="nofollow">https://frida.com/products/windi</a><p>Is that an intentional homage?
Call me old school, but I don’t want this kind of stuff on someone else’s server.
My company’s IT policy agree as well. We really need all these SaaS apps in containerized forms as well.
You might want to rethink the name. There's a weather phenomenon called "wind" where difference in pressure causes air movement between two locations. The name collision between two so obviously related things might cause confusion for people.<p>Since this isn't reddit I suppose I should get off my facetious horse and provide some useful feedback huh?<p>I really like that you can click the image and see a live demo of the application. I found that quite by accident but it was more informative than the site itself IMO. It's probably worth calling out that it is clickable with an arrow or something.<p>In fact, since you can publish the notes, it might even make sense to dogfood and use the tool itself for the documentation rather than using Docusaurus.