In the past section, there are several older links that give 404 errors. It would be great to add an archive.org link from same or earlier date so it's more convenient to go to the saved copy of the article.
I considered this a few months ago, but it's a bad idea for a few reasons. One is that it increases the load on archive.org. (There are a significant number of bots, and adding 30 million new links for them to spider is no small thing.)<p>The more important reason is that it's hard to do programmatically. For every link, you'd want to link to the most recent, active archive entry. As far as I know, this isn't easy to determine.<p>Have you ever had the experience of going to archive.org, plugging in a url, and seeing that the most recent one is actually dead, but then you can go back in time and find what you're after?<p>It's easy to say "Well, that's ok. Take me to the dead link, and I'll go back myself." Maybe. But with Dan's exacting standards, I somehow don't think that'll pass muster.<p>The ultimate reason this probably won't happen, though, is because people can do it themselves. It's not hard to copy the link and visit archive.org. Every other link (past, flag, hide, favorite) is there because it's hard to do.<p>EDIT: On the other hand, <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30384630" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30384630</a> shows a way it could be done. I didn't know about the date wildcard feature.
I was thinking the same yesterday, looking for "interview question" submissions (there have been quite a few good ones) using the algolia HN search.<p>Out of about ten links I clicked, I think there was only one that still worked. All the rest I had to run through the IA, whose homepage takes 5 seconds to load enough for the search box to show up, then wait for it to load the captures, and finally wait for it to fetch one of the captures. A direct link would be very welcome.<p>The addition should be easy, no need to query the IA site or anything because IA will find the nearest date to the request automatically iirc. Something like one week after the submission would allow post-submission updates without being likely to show a 404 capture.<p>(By the way, the question I ended up picking for our applicant was: "what did you like or dislike about the culture in previous places you've worked at or interned?" It went over well and I got some insight into what they'd expect (or enjoy) when joining the team. The colleague I did the interview with later said it was a good question :).)
I wonder if it's possible to trigger archive.org to save the exact version that gets submitted and then link specifically to that, rather than earlier or later versions.
The Web Archives browser extension is great for this. It allows you to pull up archived versions of whatever website you're on, from a variety of archive sources. My go-to lately has been using the www.archive.is option when I use the extension.<p><a href="https://github.com/dessant/web-archives" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/dessant/web-archives</a>
Hopefully dang sees this and can help. I know the mods are able to unlock a comment for editing. However I think they would most likely allow you to post a followup comment with the archive.org link.