TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ryan Bates launches RailsCasts Pro

233 pointsby illdaveover 13 years ago

23 comments

jinushaunover 13 years ago
RailsCast is an amazing service and I don't know if I could've ever learned Rails (and the RoR ecosystem) without it. Definitely a service worth paying for. I'm glad he's keeping the free episodes because it would be a shame if newbies shied away from trying it out because episodes were no longer free.
thibaut_barrereover 13 years ago
I think I'm going to subscribe just to say thanks for all his previous efforts.
评论 #3066991 未加载
评论 #3066930 未加载
评论 #3066918 未加载
评论 #3069477 未加载
thehodgeover 13 years ago
This is awesome but I'd rather pay $13 and have him split it with asciicasts
评论 #3067942 未加载
评论 #3067063 未加载
johnnygover 13 years ago
That was the easiest buying decision ever. Ryan, you are a mench. $9 a month for pro videos is a steal.
评论 #3067650 未加载
melvinramover 13 years ago
All I can say is... What took you so long Ryan?
tomblomfieldover 13 years ago
I think we're all here saying the same thing!<p>Railscasts are amazing - I always felt I should be paying something for them
desireco42over 13 years ago
Now this is a service from someone who contributed to community a lot. Unlike that textmate debacle where people would pledge money for nothing, this is the real deal and it is very reasonable. I could see how this could cost more, but I can see how with this he will probably get good following, provide for Ryan resources to continue his work.<p>I will be happy to subscribe to such service and to add, I would subscribe just to say thanks for years of awesome content.
gabyarover 13 years ago
I'm glad to see an outstandingly helpful member of the rails community earn income from what has been a mostly altruistic task that must take a lot of time every week.
cschepover 13 years ago
This feels like a response to destroyallsoftware.com. Which is AWESOME. I'm glad the "pro" market for screencasts is getting more attention.
评论 #3067452 未加载
RegExover 13 years ago
I'll definitely give this service a try. Does anyone know of any other premium rails screencast sites? I recall a link to a funny rails article on HN about a month ago that was created by a guy who does premium rails cast for $9/mo (the site has a really dark background). Wasn't able to dig that up after a weekend of searching.
评论 #3067261 未加载
评论 #3067552 未加载
barrydahlbergover 13 years ago
RailsCasts gets recommended to beginners a lot but every time I go there I'm kind of overwhelmed and have no idea where to start. The archives go back to 2007 so starting at the beginning seems likely to cover outdated subjects now. On the front page I see Draper, Spork, Sorcery, Foreman, Pry... none of this means much to me.<p>Any suggestions on how to attack this for a relative newbie to rails?
评论 #3070314 未加载
评论 #3070292 未加载
rsobersover 13 years ago
I'm so glad to see the outpouring of users who are downright happy to pay for this service. Ryan: you should add a payment option that lets people pay more than $9 per month. Let us specify the amount. I'd gladly pay more if it meant you could spend more time producing content.
Omnipresentover 13 years ago
I kind of saw this coming when I got an email from Ryan that he is cutting down on moderators for Railscasts. I was one of the lazy ones :(<p>Anyways, I'm going to subscribe not just for future episodes but for all those episodes from which I've gained immense knowledge.
mhoofmanover 13 years ago
I would guess Ryan used <a href="https://stripe.com" rel="nofollow">https://stripe.com</a> to set up reoccurring billing for Pro.<p>So will we be seeing an episode or maybe an advanced episode on how Ryan set up reoccurring billing for Railscasts?
评论 #3067493 未加载
评论 #3067514 未加载
评论 #3071306 未加载
abyssknightover 13 years ago
Good for Ryan, this is a great way for him to monetize an already awesome service.
happypeterover 13 years ago
RailsCasts is awesome, I owe so much more then $9 per month to it.<p>But here in China, many young students will still think it is too much...bad bad bad, anybody can do a less pro one, and make it free?
tsychoover 13 years ago
For some reason, RailsCasts.com is not loading up at all for me. Am I the only one seeing this? If it helps, I am using Chrome 14.0.835.186 on a Mac OSX Snow Leopard.
评论 #3071302 未加载
评论 #3069274 未加载
tomblomfieldover 13 years ago
US-only billing arrghhh
评论 #3067977 未加载
评论 #3067499 未加载
评论 #3067698 未加载
Omnipresentover 13 years ago
I wonder why Ryan is not blocking access to the source code for pro screencasts on github. Other pro screencasts such as peepcode protect the source code as well.
评论 #3067973 未加载
grepper34over 13 years ago
Honestly, I wish he would charge more. I've gained so much value from this over the years that I would gladly pay a much higher monthly fee.
评论 #3069774 未加载
jcapoteover 13 years ago
Railscasts are cool, but if you want something more advanced, I cannot recommend destroyallsoftware.com enough
matthodanover 13 years ago
Just got my Pro account-- no brainer.
hugacowover 13 years ago
Rails 3.x jumped the shark. It is getting too complicated for anyone new to come on easily. This is the reason that Scala, Clojure, Haskell, etc. will fail, too- complexity. I'm not a PhP guy, but it isn't hard to see why it is still wildly popular. Make it easy enough, and fun to use, and it will take hold.<p>So while he may make money on Rails geeks that continue on and with those that want to learn, there are fewer that are coming on and will come on now then there were.<p>If you like Rails, listen to Ryan. I've been doing RoR a while and really, really appreciate the Railscasts (and the Asciicasts of his Railscasts- thanks Eifion!). But if you are looking for a long-term framework to stand by, keep looking.
评论 #3068029 未加载
评论 #3068566 未加载
评论 #3068976 未加载
评论 #3068352 未加载
评论 #3068602 未加载
评论 #3068030 未加载