The article mentions an analysis by Nyteknik, a Swedish science periodical. That analysis (in English) is at <a href="http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3264362.ece" rel="nofollow">http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article32...</a> . It's easy to see that it was not a detailed analysis, and it concludes "Ny Teknik's conclusions disclose no hard scientific evidence, but should be viewed as a summary of our preliminary observations."<p>The comment by "popeye" shows how incomplete the analysis is.<p>Even more information is available from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer</a>
This is so dumb! I stopped reading after they mentioned this e-cat worked with hydrogen.<p>Hydrogen is not an energy source. It is not available in nature and has to be produced with .... power.