TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The Ownership Crisis

23 pointsby ericjangabout 3 years ago

6 comments

zivkovicpabout 3 years ago
Taxes are the simple answer.<p>Nobody likes paying taxes, OK, neither do I... but as a reasonable individual I understand that the system itself is more of a factor in my overall success and standard of living than my own effort and ability.<p>I&#x27;ve lived (5+ years) in a few countries and have seen first hand that this is the case.<p>Corporations arguably are worthless without the support of the economic and social system they operate in; Amazon (as an example) would likely not exist had they started their business in a small market like Grenada which has less than 0.1% of global GDP.<p>Any company that operates in a large market and leverages an educated workforce, stable economy, rule of law, etc., should have to pay TAXES. Lots of taxes. LOTS.<p>my2c
评论 #30828663 未加载
评论 #30847182 未加载
simneabout 3 years ago
I don&#x27;t think this is ownership crisis. I think this is crisis of human nature.<p>The problem has name - passionarity. The best source I know, Lev Gumilyov work (unfortunately in Russian, but google translation looks good enough, begin read on caption &quot;Passionarity levels&quot;) <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ru.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Пассионарная_теория_этногенеза" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ru.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Пассионарная_теория_этногенеза</a><p>Gumilyov does not write numbers, but current statistics say, in population there are 1.5%-5% passionaries, who usually demonstrate entrepreneur behavior (and in democracy countries, registered as self employed or run small business).<p>All others people have very low level of passionarity, and just avoid to show initiative, mostly because this lead to responsibility.<p>That&#x27;s all. Without initiative, nothing will work. Except of fraud or theft schemes, where stakes so high, that even absolutely passive people could show initiative to get so high gaining.<p>And what differ modern world from times look better, those times where one of two things, either power where extremely concentrated, so most resources where in hands of those 1.5%-5%, or exists some extremely powerful resource, like oil 100 years ago, which where good enough so passive people show initiative.<p>Now resources distributed very wide, and barriers to enter business like oil are too high, so very few passive people try to enter there.<p>Some countries show even worse things, because they for some esoteric reasons define passionarity people as enemies of normal people, and they make economy by robbing passionarity people and share loot with passive. And all these schemes end in one - they just try to rob other countries, mostly neighbors, and when on some moment fail - break apart, what exactly happen with USSR and now happen with Russia.
inglor_czabout 3 years ago
How is this new? There have been experiments with co-ops in various fields including housing since the 19th century.<p>Not all of them were unsuccessful, but their successes were mostly of local nature. A lot of the successes depended on favorable regulatory climate. Housing co-ops are significant players in some European countries and basically absent in neighboring ones, and differences in legal codes are the reason.
mark_l_watsonabout 3 years ago
I know people who are voluntarily becoming non-owners, which I think is a bad mistake.<p>One friend has always had a lavish life style, and when recently hit by cash shortage, they sold their house to a bank as a reverse mortgage. They did this 18 months ago so current high inflation is harmful to them.<p>Someone else I know just sold their only rental property because of high prices. Such a mistake because that rental property was a small hedge against inflation.<p>The World Economic Forum (the Davos billionaire club) have been test running advertisements saying that you will own nothing in the future and be very happy. To me this seems like an attack on freedom of some degree of financial independence.
kderbymaabout 3 years ago
wholly liked the article until it became a pitch....another platform isn&#x27;t going to fix this issue. it&#x27;s a deeper routed issue that stems from the inherent designs of the system and the roles people play within it.<p>it&#x27;s not fixable from within the system
anm89about 3 years ago
So theres nothing between tech executive and pay check to paycheck...?
评论 #30828576 未加载