It seems that VCs is throwing money indiscriminately at anything with a narrative.<p>Do you disagree with the fact that eco-chambers are getting bigger and louder? This in turn crowds out the true subcultures and emerging behavior.<p>If content marketing, meta-verse, tokenization of everything, short-form video, and meme investing are overrated, what seems underrated but high impact in the future?<p>What real problems are worth solving today with computers?
Unify mobile and desktop. Mobile hardware can run loads that required actual desktops 5-10 years in the past. For everyday use, especially office and productivity work, mobile hardware goes beyond capable.<p>But it's limited by the handicapped mobile platforms, who are nothing more than ad clients.<p>All it takes is to create an open (as in user has full access, no limits), responsive platform and current status quo will disappear overnight, nobody will look back. Same code running on your high-powered desktop and you "phone" or tablet, making no distinction between them other than to adapt to screen size. What programs you use on either device will solely depend on the actual program's resource requirements, nothing else.<p>Your AAA game will make no sense to be run on your phone (which can be attached to a screen), unless the game is engineered to scale to such low extremes. Your code editor, on the other hand, can be run wherever.
If the goal is generally to invest, then be boring. Split it among several ETF's.<p>If the goal is to support a project which will improve the world, I'd support existing projects to either make clean water more accessible or help the world's poorest people become more self-sufficient (eg, Heifer International).
I would go with tax preparation software. Barring that, OCR, and then, internet radio.<p><a href="https://www.ibisworld.com/united-states/industry-trends/industries-highest-profit-margin/" rel="nofollow">https://www.ibisworld.com/united-states/industry-trends/indu...</a><p>Profit is the most reliable signal of what people need. If they're paying extra, it means they get even more value out of it.<p>Not allowing profit is when economies fall.
With a 'wind fall' 1 million dollars,<p>I would take about 20% and plan to squander it. Vacations, car, cloths.<p>I would put 80% in something with a time lock of about a year. Something with a penalty for early withdraw. This would provide 2 features:<p>1) Time to think about it<p>2) Protection from 'newly discovered' relatives and friends who want a piece. "Sorry I would love to help, but the money is invested, and there are SEVER penalties for early withdraw, you do not want me severely penalized do you?"<p>Now if you are talking about how I would invest a million dollars, that would be different. Short term I like lampshades idea of Wheat. Anything natural gas. Anything to protect against inflation.
$1 million free-and-clear to me alone? After taxes, I'd put it into index funds and then take some time off to spend time with family and to change to a certain career adjacent to my current one that I would love to do.<p>$1 million for investment, but otherwise free-and-clear? I'd form an LLC and then buy into local cash-flow businesses like laundromats, equipment rentals, and apartment rentals. Then I would use the cash flow from those business to pursue more exploratory business ideas.
The most impactful idea I’ve ever had is that the us government procurement system is broken.
Use it or lose it creates waste, programs are planned and executed by people who don’t understand them, rules are not tied to outcomes.<p>A new system for procurement and allocation could save trillions of dollars of waste. A couple economists and game theory specialists might be able to crack it. It’d be worth a million to try.
Pre pay for kid's school, invest in low risk funds, pay off my mortgage. After the mortgage, I have zero debt. From there, it's very easy to just keep saving and paying cash for things (like cars).<p>A million dollars is not a lot but applied well, it can reshape a life.
I think there are real problems that computers can solve, such as engineering rockets to obliterate meteorites that may destroy earth. Also, producing jobs for citizens that have an interest in computers. On the other hand, computers can also generate problems that must in turn be dealt with. Thus computer in themselves have an entire eco-chamber of worth. One million dollars could be used to make more money perpetually, thus it could be used for help or hurt. Thus you would need to use it for immediate help such as food, clothing and shelter while the money continued to generate upon itself.
I would invest in something that would have an amplified impact, but probably no benefit for me.<p>Personally, something that would really help me, is that I make very irrational stupid decisions and waste time. I would like to create some piece of software that prevents that. Something that prompts me, with messages like "What should you be doing?" or helps me make decisions.<p>Also, I would like it if it presented news articles that are not obviously biased, and then you have a quiz that asks questions about if you know what the bias was, or if the conclusion of the article was correct.
I guess it depends on if this counts as computers (technically it does IMO!), but with a million bucks to start a business I would get like an excavator and a dump truck and start a contracting company or something similar. Or a bucket truck and industrial wood-chipper and start a tree company. Something along those lines. There's tons of demand, a high barrier to entry, and it's all real-world usefulness.<p>The big roadblock is I don't know how to drive a dump truck, excavator, or bucket truck though. :)
Fund a service that provides weekly, short (1,000 words or less) summaries of news events from multiple angles. Not just summaries of <i>other</i> news sites, but educated, informed takes presented in "we don't want to waste your time, so we'll get to the point" fashion.<p>I would love to spend an hour a week reading a newsletter about what's going on in the world. Especially if it lets me ignore the hype and advertising-led news cycle.
I know it's a typo, but I kind of like the idea of eco-chambers. It made me think of the Biosphere 2 project. I'd love to see somebody take another crack at that.<p>To answer your question - $1 million would fund two or three skilled people full time for a year. So the problem has to be relatively small. I'd maybe spend it on an ad blitz to try to find homes for dogs and cats currently in shelters in a small number of cities.
With that I could dedicate to work in a spiritual successor of the FoxPro family of products (<a href="https://tablam.org" rel="nofollow">https://tablam.org</a>).<p>Is not as high-impact that save the earth, but I think is important to give real alternatives to the excess of "cloud-dependent" tech that exist. Local-first, truly personal, etc.
I'd pay off some debt for myself and some family, set aside a chunk for a close family member to purchase a home, and set aside a fund to pay for health insurance for another who can't afford it.<p>A million dollars is not enough to guarantee you can improve the lives of many but it's certainly enough to do it for a few.
A million dollars would be a lot but with some funding I'll like to work full time on <a href="https://formester.com" rel="nofollow">https://formester.com</a> and build a go to place for any kind of form on the internet.
> What real problems are worth solving today with computers?<p>1 million dollars would solve one problem: buying myself a house. I can handle the transaction using a computer.
"Two chicks at the same time."<p>But in all seriousness, I don't think $1mm is enough to move the needle in the grand scheme of things. I would save it for retirement, maybe buy a new car.