TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Tell HN: Adobe took down the PDF 1.7 specification from their site

114 pointsby steerablesafeabout 3 years ago
I just discovered that Adobe took down the PDF 1.7 specification from their site. It&#x27;s used to be hosted at [1] and I can&#x27;t find a replacement. Of course this doesn&#x27;t mean that the specification can&#x27;t be acquired freely from elsewhere [2, 3], but it&#x27;s unfortunate if the authoritative source is down. Hopefully it is a mistake though and it will be back up.<p>[1] http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.adobe.com&#x2F;content&#x2F;dam&#x2F;acom&#x2F;en&#x2F;devnet&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;pdfs&#x2F;PDF32000_2008.pdf<p>[2] https:&#x2F;&#x2F;christianhaider.de&#x2F;dokuwiki&#x2F;lib&#x2F;exe&#x2F;fetch.php?media=pdf:pdf32000_2008.pdf<p>[3] https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20220309040754if_&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.adobe.com&#x2F;content&#x2F;dam&#x2F;acom&#x2F;en&#x2F;devnet&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;pdfs&#x2F;PDF32000_2008.pdf

7 comments

darrenfabout 3 years ago
It&#x27;s still available at this Adobe URL: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;opensource.adobe.com&#x2F;dc-acrobat-sdk-docs&#x2F;standards&#x2F;pdfstandards&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;PDF32000_2008.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;opensource.adobe.com&#x2F;dc-acrobat-sdk-docs&#x2F;standards&#x2F;p...</a> &quot;<i>As distributed by Adobe after adoption as ISO 32000-1:2008, with permission of ISO.</i>&quot; [0]<p>Not to mention ISO unsurprisingly host it, which I would also consider authoritative: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.iso.org&#x2F;obp&#x2F;ui&#x2F;#iso:std:iso:32000:-1:ed-1:v1:en" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.iso.org&#x2F;obp&#x2F;ui&#x2F;#iso:std:iso:32000:-1:ed-1:v1:en</a><p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.loc.gov&#x2F;preservation&#x2F;digital&#x2F;formats&#x2F;fdd&#x2F;fdd000277.shtml" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.loc.gov&#x2F;preservation&#x2F;digital&#x2F;formats&#x2F;fdd&#x2F;fdd0002...</a>
评论 #30867163 未加载
评论 #30897781 未加载
评论 #30867144 未加载
评论 #30870909 未加载
iceblockderbyabout 3 years ago
The ISO released the 2.0 version of the specification that replaces the 1.7 standard.<p>&quot;Although it is an open standard, one major difference compared with prior versions of PDF is that ISO now holds the copyright to the PDF specification and thus PDF 2.0 is not freely downloadable.&quot; [0]<p>It looks like DMCA requests are being issued to anyone that hosted the old specification, even open source projects [1].<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pdfa.org&#x2F;resource&#x2F;iso-32000-pdf&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pdfa.org&#x2F;resource&#x2F;iso-32000-pdf&#x2F;</a> [1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;Hopding&#x2F;pdf-lib#git-history-rewrite" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;Hopding&#x2F;pdf-lib#git-history-rewrite</a>
评论 #30868351 未加载
dorianmariefrabout 3 years ago
&gt; This page was updated on 23 March 2022 as many direct links to legacy PDF specifications on adobe.com were broken. Many links now reference the Wayback Machine internet archive and thus may be slow.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pdfa.org&#x2F;resource&#x2F;pdf-specification-index&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pdfa.org&#x2F;resource&#x2F;pdf-specification-index&#x2F;</a>
colejohnson66about 3 years ago
It&#x27;s possible they&#x27;re reworking their CMS and that causes files to be moved (breaking links everywhere). Microsoft loves doing that with their developer blogs.
评论 #30867648 未加载
jeffreportmill1about 3 years ago
Off topic, but man is that document hard to use as a reference. Ironically, I wish they would publish it as HTML broken down by chapter and section.<p>(I have used that document a lot to write a custom PDF generator and parser in Java, using a downloaded copy)
评论 #30867451 未加载
评论 #30867038 未加载
评论 #30868803 未加载
andrewmcwattersabout 3 years ago
Maybe one of the side effects of this is that people only continue writing against PDF 1.7.
hulituabout 3 years ago
Maybe they want to sell it :)