I'd love to hear some insider scoops about the Air Force One contract on which they attributed $660 million of the loss. There are lots of vague statements, but no details on what really went down.<p>> «I’m going to call it [the Air Force One deal] a very unique moment, a very unique negotiation, a very unique set of risks that Boeing probably shouldn’t have taken,» he said. «But we are where we are, and we’re going to deliver great airplanes. And we’re going to recognize the costs associated with it.»<p>I'm surprised shareholders haven't demanded a better explanation yet.
It doesn’t matter what Boeing loses. Uncle Sam will backstop. This isn’t a nightmare. It’s just life. The idea that the US would allow any poor outcome for Boeing is like believing PG&E will go bust.
"in April 2020, it had already declared it would cost 168 million for «engineering inefficiencies» caused by the pandemic" -> what do they mean blaming engineering inefficiencies on the pandemic?
Americans hiring outside of US: "you realize that with 45k USD salary you'd be in the top 5% of your country's population? Best we can do is 35k USD".<p>Americans spending on their military: "billion here, billion there, everyone gets a billion".
The cost does seem excessive, but it’s surprising that Boeing would make such a bad deal given that the U.S. government had no real alternative. What is the president going to ride in, an Airbus?