TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Google Reader cutting internal social features, integrating into Google+

140 pointsby heydenberkover 13 years ago

21 comments

nathanbover 13 years ago
This is horrifyingly frustrating. It's like when they started adding people from my email contacts to my Google Talk friends list or when they thought my gtalk friends list needed to be all up in my Google Reader friends list. Google don't seem to understand the natural partitioning of social spaces that occurs in the real world.<p>(I do concur that Circles allow this partitioning to be modeled much more accurately than most other social networking systems, but the partitioning before was entirely organic and natural, not constructed. I will wait and see how well they implement the integration before conclusively declaring Reader to have jumped the shark, but honestly the social features ("just enough social to get by", which is about as much social as I can put up with) were the only things keeping me on Reader up until this point.
评论 #3136704 未加载
评论 #3136727 未加载
评论 #3136320 未加载
nextparadigmsover 13 years ago
Google has a lot of redundant social features in other products. This makes sense. I hope they remove the "like" buttons from Youtube, too, and replace them with +1.
评论 #3136373 未加载
rednaughtover 13 years ago
Each time a prompt for an alternative news reader appears, this one seems to get some attention: <a href="http://www.newsblur.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsblur.com/</a><p>I personally just use the newsreader built into Opera now. Just good enough for my needs.
评论 #3136258 未加载
评论 #3136629 未加载
评论 #3136251 未加载
losvedirover 13 years ago
Honestly, I've always been extremely confused by the Google Reader sharing mechanism. I use Reader all the time, but I've never been clear on who exactly the shares go to. This is much better, IMO.
Oompaover 13 years ago
Do many people use these features? Most of the people that I know who use Google Reader, myself included, just use it as an RSS reader. Sending it to other social networks is the one thing that I do use, and they won't be changing that.
评论 #3136844 未加载
评论 #3136347 未加载
评论 #3136325 未加载
评论 #3138750 未加载
armandososaover 13 years ago
I actually like these news. I've been using Reader since it came out (what's it? 6 years?) but never get to use to their social features.<p>Also: star, like, share, tag. Those are too many options. Give me a +1 and a "Share" button and I'm set.<p>I thought this discussion needed a thread that wasn't all "I hate change".
评论 #3137272 未加载
评论 #3137514 未加载
zavulonover 13 years ago
I really don't care about any social features in Google Reader. The only thing that matters to me is I can continue easily subscribe and read RSS feeds. And with a "brand new design that we hope you love", I sincerely hope they don't fuck that up.
评论 #3136961 未加载
评论 #3136434 未加载
RexRollmanover 13 years ago
I worry that, in an effort to compete with Facebook, Google is going to ruin everything I liked about their products.
mxavierover 13 years ago
I'm sure Google considered this but I hope that by default, my feed subscriptions are shared with nobody in my Google+ circles and that I have to opt those people in. Doing otherwise would be the equivalent of dumping the contents of your browser bookmarks for all your friends to see. There may be some things people subscribe to that they'd prefer others didn't know about.
评论 #3137359 未加载
hesselinkover 13 years ago
Interesting that all the replies here are negative. Am I really the only one who welcomes these changes? Of the people I want to share with, only a few also use Reader. There are much more of them on Google+. This also allows for more fine-grained sharing, so I won't have to share programming-related posts with people who are not interested in that kind of article.
omelletover 13 years ago
I'm mostly upset that Google Reader will now be blocked at work, because the IT dept blocks all social network sites.
评论 #3136354 未加载
beej71over 13 years ago
Without some sort of "public circles" option on Google+, people won't be able to subscribe to my "techstuff" feed--I'd need to manually "subscribe" them. Pretty icky.
评论 #3137517 未加载
ukdmover 13 years ago
Awaits the "Best alternatives to Reader" post appearing on HN
评论 #3136278 未加载
评论 #3136717 未加载
MatthewPhillipsover 13 years ago
The first thing I do when I log into Google Reader is mark all "shared items" as read, without reading any of them. I don't want my RSS reader to be social. I don't want my unread count to reflect sources that I didn't opt into. The sooner I can disable all social aspects of Google Reader, the sooner I stop looking for an alternative.
评论 #3138207 未加载
twelvedigitsover 13 years ago
One vote against. I love Google Reader. I have intelligent friends that share actively on it. I don't use Google Plus. I don't know if those friends use Google Plus. Now, I won't read the articles that my friends are sharing. I also expect sharing will go down as Google forcibly alters user behavior and manages an adoption problem.<p>In effect, Google is now impeding my access to great information. That's counter to their mission, isn't it? And it's risky to do this to a very loyal user group. Google Reader users are passionate about this product.
rachelbythebayover 13 years ago
Great. I knew this day would come.<p>Guess I need to speed up my work on a Google Reader replacement.
评论 #3136107 未加载
captn3m0over 13 years ago
I find it ironic that the blog post does not have a "Share to google+", or the "+1 Button"
评论 #3138790 未加载
willy1234x1over 13 years ago
None of this is frustrating and it shouldn't come to a shock to anyone. Google stated that they were going to deeply integrate Google+ into all its products. This is them just following through.
flargover 13 years ago
And yet the blog post itself is linked to Digg and not G+<p>Oh Google :(
shaggyover 13 years ago
Forgive me for what might be huge ignorance and stupidity on my part but does this mean that I'm now required to have a G+ account to use Reader?
评论 #3137358 未加载
tristan_louisover 13 years ago
The interesting thing is how they are cutting some features to "improve" it. I suspect that when it's done, it will be impossible to send items to Twitter or Facebook from it (you'll have to send things to Google+ instead).<p>It's also a big question as to what you can do to save your starred items moving forward. Anyone wants to build a starred items to delicious exporter?
评论 #3136372 未加载
评论 #3136205 未加载
评论 #3136353 未加载