I see there is a Rails gem for Foundation:
<a href="https://github.com/zurb/foundation-rails" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/zurb/foundation-rails</a><p>But please, tell me why I should use this rather than Skeleton (<a href="http://getskeleton.com/" rel="nofollow">http://getskeleton.com/</a>) or Twitter's Bootstrap (<a href="http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/</a>)?
Sounds similar to Skeleton (<a href="http://getskeleton.com/" rel="nofollow">http://getskeleton.com/</a>) but a little more in-depth (I noticed more attention to forms in Foundation, which is nice).
The page itself seems to resize pretty gracefully with one exception. Between a width of about 800-950 for me on Firefox there is a fairly sizable amount of empty space (about 750px) before the page content starts.
Very excited by this, looks very nice and pretty handy. The more choice in this space the better in my opinion. Having Tim Ferris in there makes it seem like this is going to change my life.
I like the fact that they've got boilerplate styles but their "grid" is still using floats, big strike out there.<p>The <a href="http://stacklayout.com/" rel="nofollow">http://stacklayout.com/</a> is heaps better - using display:inline-block; for nestable grids means no more annoying column classes etc. It's a much nicer way to work