TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: Would mining for oil in the United States again bring down gas prices?

2 pointsby greatjack613about 3 years ago
I have been wondering what would happen if we would start mining for oil again in the United States, would it bring down gas prices? As for environmental concerns I don’t think we are any worse the having another country mine the oil and then send it over, in fact the transport costs makes it probably twice as worse in terms of the environment. So why don’t we just start mining for oil again here?

4 comments

PaulHouleabout 3 years ago
According to Wikipedia, the U.S. is currently the world&#x27;s #1 producer<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;List_of_countries_by_oil_production" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;List_of_countries_by_oil_produ...</a>
ubermanabout 3 years ago
The US produces 16.582 million barrels of oil per day. In fact, it exports more than it imports making the US a net exported.<p>Can you clarify what do you mean by &quot;start mining for oil again&quot;?
has_cookiesabout 3 years ago
Great Video on the topic came out about a week ago by Wendover Productions: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=AQbmpecxS2w" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=AQbmpecxS2w</a><p>Should Answer your questions and fill the details.
incomingpainabout 3 years ago
Would increasing supply of a commodity decrease it&#x27;s cost?<p>Yes, obviously.<p>&gt;As for environmental concerns I don’t think we are any worse the having another country mine the oil and then send it over, in fact the transport costs makes it probably twice as worse in terms of the environment. So why don’t we just start mining for oil again here?<p>You will notice over the next 5-10 years climate change is going to go away as a subject. It won&#x27;t go away permanently, but it&#x27;s going to a non-subject.<p>Most climate change graphs start around 1850 because solar activity went into the <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Modern_Maximum" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Modern_Maximum</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Solar_maximum#&#x2F;media&#x2F;File:Sunspot_Numbers.png" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Solar_maximum#&#x2F;media&#x2F;File:Suns...</a><p>We haven&#x27;t named the new cycle we entered around 2010. We don&#x27;t want to mislead science deniers into thinking the sun is involved in climate change at all.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Global_warming_hiatus" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Global_warming_hiatus</a><p>Yes there has been a hiatus in global warming, it&#x27;s just coincidence that climate change started during the modern maximum and now that we exited the solar maximum and entered a yet unnamed minimum and global warming stopped. It&#x27;s pure coincidence.<p>What&#x27;s going to happen is that we just drop the subject for some time. We muddy the subject by saying it was el-nino.
评论 #31371609 未加载