TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Amazon and the dystopian future of book censorship

50 pointsby sprovoostalmost 3 years ago

7 comments

pushcxalmost 3 years ago
&gt; The whitepaper was included with the rest of the source code, which was released with the MIT license, see e.g. this archive.<p>It doesn&#x27;t? The archive he links to includes a copy of the whitepaper, but this repo is one archivist&#x27;s collection of files, not an official distribution. The whitepaper is not in the nov08 distribution or the bitcoin-0.1.0.tgz, and the document doesn&#x27;t include a license statement. I&#x27;d believe it&#x27;s MIT licensed, but this post doesn&#x27;t establish that fact or sound like he presented more compelling support of the idea to Amazon.<p>As a practical matter, it&#x27;s vanishingly unlikely that Satoshi Nakamoto is going to file suit. But as a legal matter, he hasn&#x27;t shown that the whitepaper was released under a license permitting redistribution or that he has permission from the author. Amazon gave him several options and opportunities, then declined to participate in apparent copyright infringement.<p>Amazon has a huge problem with people republishing others&#x27; books via KDP and their marketplace, even getting fake versions added to or replacing authentic listings. This process seems like it might be a pretty good way of addressing that. The inconvenience comes from not wanting to give the well-practiced scammers a guide to defeating the process, which is a common tradeoff.
评论 #31594733 未加载
评论 #31589412 未加载
giaouralmost 3 years ago
So in this dystopian future, the OP had to deal with shitty customer service from a discount publisher for a while and then went with a competitor as a result? And the competitor was still able to distribute copies via Amazon?<p>I&#x27;m just not seeing anything remotely like censorship here.
评论 #31594649 未加载
GeneT45almost 3 years ago
Really no different than a flesh-and-blood editor questioning copyright. This is not the dystopian future you&#x27;re looking for...
评论 #31589774 未加载
cmeacham98almost 3 years ago
&gt; Just know that there are other options too. For now.<p>Author baselessly predicts all other publishers will die out and Amazon will be the only option. Ironically, their article supports the opposite: presumably other publishers will continue to be successful specifically because of issues like this with Amazon KDP.<p>Not exactly the hard hitting content I expected from the title.
评论 #31594666 未加载
koshergweiloalmost 3 years ago
This really another case of someone crying &quot;censorship&quot; when an automated process fails.
评论 #31594929 未加载
temp8964almost 3 years ago
TLDR: Amazon thinks his book has a copyright violation but refuses to reveal the details.
评论 #31594984 未加载
Adraghastalmost 3 years ago
You decided to self-publish and got what you wanted. If you wanted a real person to take the time to sort it out with you, you should have found a real publisher willing to take you on.
评论 #31594789 未加载