Reminds of me of this charming example of United Statesian justice:<p>Alabama woman charged after losing unborn baby in shooting
<a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48789836" rel="nofollow">https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48789836</a>
The author seems to be making a big leap: assuming that when someone is accused of a crime, it's the responsibility of the accused to prove that a crime didn't actually happen.<p>Is that actually the case? My possibly-very-flawed layman's view of the legal system is that it's on the prosecutor to prove that you did something wrong. So if you just say "oh I played around with the app and gave it random input" or "I had a miscarriage", then the onus is on the government to explain why that isn't the case.